• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

起始至治疗时间和动脉瘤退缩与症状性颈内动脉动脉瘤患者血流导向治疗后颅神经功能改善相关。

Onset-to-treatment time and aneurysmal regression predict improvement of cranial neuropathy after flow diversion treatment in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery aneurysms.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):886-891. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019202. Epub 2022 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1136/jnis-2022-019202
PMID:35853697
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10447392/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although flow diversion plays a pivotal role in treating internal carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial neuropathy, predictors of symptom improvement have not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate improvement of symptoms after flow diversion treatment in patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms causing cranial neuropathy, with sufficient follow-up period. Additionally, to examine factors associated with improvement of symptoms.

METHODS

This retrospective multicenter study examined patients with unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial neuropathy who were treated using flow diversion and followed up for at least 12 months. Study outcomes were transient worsening of symptoms and symptom status 12 months after treatment. Patient and aneurysm characteristics were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were included. Data needed for outcome analysis were available for 66 patients. At the 1-, 3-, 6-, 12-month, and last follow-ups, the proportion of patients with resolved or improved symptoms was 26% (20/77), 51% (39/77), 74% (57/77), 83% (64/77), and 79%(62/77), respectively. Symptom onset-to-treatment time <6 months (OR=24.2; 95% CI 3.09 to 188.84; p=0.002) and aneurysmal regression (OR=23.1; 95% CI 1.97 to 271.75; p=0.012) were significantly associated with symptom improvement. Transient symptom worsening and worse symptoms at 12 months occurred in 19/77 (25%) and 2/77 (3%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of cranial neuropathy symptom improvement after flow diversion increased over the first 12 months after treatment, but not thereafter. Treatment within 6 months of symptom onset and aneurysmal regression were predictors of symptom improvement.

摘要

背景

尽管血流导向装置在治疗伴有颅神经病变的颈内动脉动脉瘤中起着关键作用,但尚未确定症状改善的预测因素。

目的

探讨血流导向装置治疗伴有颅神经病变的颈内动脉动脉瘤患者的症状改善情况,并进行足够的随访。此外,还研究了与症状改善相关的因素。

方法

本回顾性多中心研究纳入了接受血流导向装置治疗且随访时间至少 12 个月的未破裂颈内动脉动脉瘤伴有颅神经病变的患者。研究结局为症状一过性恶化和治疗后 12 个月的症状状态。对患者和动脉瘤特征进行了统计学分析。

结果

共纳入 77 例患者。有 66 例患者的数据可用于结局分析。在 1、3、6、12 个月和末次随访时,症状缓解或改善的患者比例分别为 26%(20/77)、51%(39/77)、74%(57/77)、83%(64/77)和 79%(62/77)。症状出现至治疗时间<6 个月(OR=24.2;95%CI 3.09 至 188.84;p=0.002)和动脉瘤缩小(OR=23.1;95%CI 1.97 至 271.75;p=0.012)与症状改善显著相关。77 例患者中有 19 例(25%)出现一过性症状恶化,2 例(3%)患者在 12 个月时症状恶化。

结论

血流导向装置治疗后 12 个月内颅神经病变症状改善的比例逐渐增加,但此后不再增加。症状出现后 6 个月内治疗和动脉瘤缩小是症状改善的预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e54/10447392/9e927a1141be/jnis-2022-019202f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e54/10447392/9e927a1141be/jnis-2022-019202f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e54/10447392/9e927a1141be/jnis-2022-019202f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Onset-to-treatment time and aneurysmal regression predict improvement of cranial neuropathy after flow diversion treatment in patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery aneurysms.起始至治疗时间和动脉瘤退缩与症状性颈内动脉动脉瘤患者血流导向治疗后颅神经功能改善相关。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):886-891. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019202. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
2
The fate of cranial neuropathy after flow diversion for carotid aneurysms.颈动脉动脉瘤血流改道术后颅神经病变的转归
J Neurosurg. 2016 Apr;124(4):1107-13. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.JNS142790. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
3
Flow Diverter Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Clinical Outcomes and Factors for Symptom Improvement.血流导向装置治疗症状性颅内颈内动脉动脉瘤:临床结局和症状改善的因素。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2023 Aug 15;63(8):343-349. doi: 10.2176/jns-nmc.2022-0389. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
4
Flow diversion for internal carotid artery aneurysms with compressive neuro-ophthalmologic symptoms: clinical and anatomical results in an international multicenter study.伴有压迫性神经眼科症状的颈内动脉动脉瘤的血流导向装置治疗:一项国际多中心研究的临床和解剖学结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Nov;14(11):1090-1095. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018188. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Mass Effect After Flow Diversion for Unruptured Large and Giant Cavernous or Paraclinoid Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm.血流导向装置治疗未破裂大型及巨大海绵窦或眶周颈内动脉动脉瘤后的效果。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec;180:e108-e116. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.129. Epub 2023 Sep 9.
6
Flow diversion for compressive unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms with neuro-ophthalmological symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.伴有神经眼科症状的压迫性未破裂颈内动脉动脉瘤的血流导向治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Sep;15(9):892-897. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2022-019249. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
7
Flow diversion for internal carotid artery aneurysms: Impact of complex aneurysm features and overview of outcome.血流导向装置治疗颈内动脉动脉瘤:复杂动脉瘤特征的影响及结果概述。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Jun;193:105782. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105782. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
Unruptured large and giant carotid artery aneurysms presenting with cranial nerve palsy: comparison of clinical recovery after selective aneurysm coiling and therapeutic carotid artery occlusion.表现为颅神经麻痹的未破裂大型和巨大型颈动脉动脉瘤:选择性动脉瘤栓塞与治疗性颈动脉闭塞后临床恢复情况的比较
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 May;29(5):997-1002. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1023. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
9
Unruptured giant intracavernous aneurysms untolerate internal carotid artery occlusion test: Untreated and treated with flow-diversion.未破裂的巨大海绵窦内动脉瘤不能耐受颈内动脉闭塞试验:未治疗及经血流导向治疗。
Neuroradiol J. 2020 Apr;33(2):105-111. doi: 10.1177/1971400919898109. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
10
Recovery from Cranial Nerve Symptoms after Flow Diversion without Coiling for Unruptured Very Large and Giant ICA Aneurysms.血流导向装置治疗未破裂的巨大颈内动脉动脉瘤后不使用弹簧圈治疗颅神经症状的恢复。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2022 May;43(5):736-740. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7498. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical treatment of a giant paraophthalmic aneurysm postfailed flow diversion through endoscopic endonasal approach: Technical nuances and review of the literature.经鼻内镜入路血流导向失败后巨大眶旁动脉瘤的手术治疗:技术细节及文献综述
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Mar 8;15:75. doi: 10.25259/SNI_939_2023. eCollection 2024.
2
Predictors of aneurysm shrinkage after flow diversion treatment for internal carotid artery aneurysms: quantitative volume analysis with MRI.颈内动脉动脉瘤血流导向治疗后动脉瘤缩小的预测因素:MRI定量容积分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1266460. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1266460. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term Follow-up Results after Flow Diverter Therapy Using the Pipeline Embolization Device for Large or Giant Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Single-center Retrospective Analysis in the Japanese Population.采用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗大型或巨大未破裂颈内动脉动脉瘤的长期随访结果:日本单中心回顾性分析。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2022 Jan 15;62(1):19-27. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2021-0203. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
Neck Location on the Outer Convexity is a Predictor of Incomplete Occlusion in Treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes.颈外凸部位是使用 Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗时不完全闭塞的预测因素:临床和血管造影结果。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):119-125. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6859. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
3
De novo expansion formation in the outer curvature of the internal carotid artery after flow diverter deployment for an infectious cavernous carotid aneurysm: illustrative case.
血流导向装置置入治疗感染性海绵窦段颈内动脉瘤后颈内动脉外曲部的新生扩张形成:病例报告
J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2023 Jun 12;5(24). doi: 10.3171/CASE23124.
Variation of Mass Effect After Using a Flow Diverter With Adjunctive Coil Embolization for Symptomatic Unruptured Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms.使用血流导向装置联合弹簧圈栓塞治疗症状性未破裂大型和巨大型颅内动脉瘤后质量效应的变化
Front Neurol. 2019 Nov 12;10:1191. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01191. eCollection 2019.
4
Flow Diverter Therapy Using a Pipeline Embolization Device for 100 Unruptured Large and Giant Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms in a Single Center in a Japanese Population.在日本某单中心使用Pipeline栓塞装置对100例未破裂的大型和巨大型颈内动脉瘤进行血流导向治疗。
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2018 Nov 15;58(11):461-467. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2018-0148. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
5
Vision outcomes in patients with paraclinoid aneurysms treated with clipping, coiling, or flow diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.采用夹闭、栓塞或血流导向治疗的床突旁动脉瘤患者的视力预后:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Jun;42(6):E15. doi: 10.3171/2017.3.FOCUS1718.
6
Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial.使用密网支架治疗复杂颈内动脉动脉瘤后的长期临床和血管造影结果:不可栓塞或栓塞失败动脉瘤的密网支架试验五年结果
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):40-48. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw014.
7
Innovations in Endovascular Treatment Strategies for Large Carotid Cavernous Aneurysms-The Safety and Efficacy of a Flow Diverter.大型颈内动脉海绵窦段动脉瘤血管内治疗策略的创新——血流导向装置的安全性和有效性
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 May;26(5):1071-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.12.023. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Safety and efficacy of the Pipeline embolization device for treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of 3 large studies.Pipeline 栓塞装置治疗颅内动脉瘤的安全性和有效性:3 项大型研究的汇总分析。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Oct;127(4):775-780. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.JNS16467. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
9
An outcomes-based grading scale for the evaluation of cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion.一种基于结果的分级量表,用于评估采用血流导向治疗的脑动脉瘤。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2017 Nov;9(11):1060-1063. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012688. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
10
Learning from failure: persistence of aneurysms following pipeline embolization.从失败中学习:血流导向装置栓塞后动脉瘤的持续性。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Feb;126(2):578-585. doi: 10.3171/2015.12.JNS152065. Epub 2016 May 6.