Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Feb;12(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00121.x.
An R0 margin width of 1 cm has traditionally been considered a prerequisite to minimize local recurrence and optimize survival following hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, recent data have called into question the prognostic importance of the '1-cm rule'. Specifically, several studies have noted that, although an R0 resection is important, the actual margin width may not be as critical. We provide a brief overview of the impact of an R1 vs. an R0 resection on local recurrence and overall survival. In addition, we specifically review the impact of margin width in patients who have undergone an R0 resection. Finally, we highlight those factors most associated with an increased likelihood of an R1 resection and provide recommendations for avoiding and dealing with microscopic carcinoma discovered intraoperatively at the cut parenchymal transection margin.
传统上,1 厘米的 R0 切缘宽度被认为是降低肝转移结直肠癌切除术后局部复发率和优化生存的前提。然而,最近的数据对“1 厘米法则”的预后重要性提出了质疑。具体来说,一些研究指出,尽管 R0 切除很重要,但实际的切缘宽度可能并不那么关键。我们简要概述了 R1 与 R0 切除对局部复发和总生存的影响。此外,我们特别回顾了在接受 R0 切除的患者中切缘宽度的影响。最后,我们强调了与 R1 切除发生率增加最相关的因素,并提供了避免和处理术中发现的切缘实质横断处的微转移癌的建议。