• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估添加新预测指标后诊断效用的改善情况。

Evaluating the improvement in diagnostic utility from adding new predictors.

作者信息

Li Caixia, Lu Ying

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 94143-0946, USA.

出版信息

Biom J. 2010 Jun;52(3):417-35. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900228.

DOI:10.1002/bimj.200900228
PMID:20496347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3517010/
Abstract

Multiple diagnostic tests and risk factors are commonly available for many diseases. This information can be either redundant or complimentary. Combining them may improve the diagnostic/predictive accuracy, but also unnecessarily increase complexity, risks, and/or costs. The improved accuracy gained by including additional variables can be evaluated by the increment of the area under (AUC) the receiver-operating characteristic curves with and without the new variable(s). In this study, we derive a new test statistic to accurately and efficiently determine the statistical significance of this incremental AUC under a multivariate normality assumption. Our test links AUC difference to a quadratic form of a standardized mean shift in a unit of the inverse covariance matrix through a properly linear transformation of all diagnostic variables. The distribution of the quadratic estimator is related to the multivariate Behrens-Fisher problem. We provide explicit mathematical solutions of the estimator and its approximate non-central F-distribution, type I error rate, and sample size formula. We use simulation studies to prove that our new test maintains prespecified type I error rates as well as reasonable statistical power under practical sample sizes. We use data from the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures as an application example to illustrate our method.

摘要

多种诊断测试和风险因素通常可用于许多疾病。这些信息可能是冗余的,也可能是互补的。将它们结合起来可能会提高诊断/预测准确性,但也会不必要地增加复杂性、风险和/或成本。通过纳入额外变量所获得的准确性提高,可以通过比较包含和不包含新变量时接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)的增量来评估。在本研究中,我们推导了一个新的检验统计量,以便在多元正态性假设下准确有效地确定这种增量AUC的统计显著性。我们的检验通过对所有诊断变量进行适当的线性变换,将AUC差异与逆协方差矩阵单位中标准化均值偏移的二次形式联系起来。二次估计量的分布与多元贝伦斯 - 费希尔问题相关。我们提供了估计量的显式数学解及其近似非中心F分布、I型错误率和样本量公式。我们通过模拟研究证明,我们的新检验在实际样本量下保持了预先指定的I型错误率以及合理的统计功效。我们以骨质疏松性骨折研究的数据为例来说明我们的方法。

相似文献

1
Evaluating the improvement in diagnostic utility from adding new predictors.评估添加新预测指标后诊断效用的改善情况。
Biom J. 2010 Jun;52(3):417-35. doi: 10.1002/bimj.200900228.
2
Equivalence of improvement in area under ROC curve and linear discriminant analysis coefficient under assumption of normality.在正态假设下,ROC 曲线下面积的改善与线性判别分析系数的等价性。
Stat Med. 2011 May 30;30(12):1410-8. doi: 10.1002/sim.4196. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of the A-test and cutoff points for assessing outcomes and planning acute and post-acute rehabilitation of patients surgically treated for hip fractures and osteoarthritis.A测试在评估接受髋关节骨折和骨关节炎手术治疗患者的预后及规划急性和亚急性康复方面的诊断准确性及截断点。
Vojnosanit Pregl. 2016 Dec;73(12):1139-48. doi: 10.2298/VSP150819056V.
4
A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.一种用于确定诊断测试的简单组合是否可能不劣于理论最优组合的程序。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):909-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318462. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
5
Predicting Hip Fracture Type With Cortical Bone Mapping (CBM) in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study.利用男性骨质疏松性骨折研究中的皮质骨图谱(CBM)预测髋部骨折类型。
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Nov;30(11):2067-77. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2552. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
6
A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size.小样本量连续诊断试验中ROC曲线下面积的置信/可信区间方法比较
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2603-2621. doi: 10.1177/0962280215602040. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
7
Sample size calculation for comparing two ROC curves.比较两条 ROC 曲线的样本量计算。
Pharm Stat. 2024 Jul-Aug;23(4):557-569. doi: 10.1002/pst.2371. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
8
Single reader between-cases AUC estimator with nested data.基于嵌套数据的单读者病例间 AUC 估计器。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Nov;31(11):2069-2086. doi: 10.1177/09622802221111539. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
9
Inference for the difference in the area under the ROC curve derived from nested binary regression models.基于嵌套二元回归模型的ROC曲线下面积差异的推断。
Biostatistics. 2017 Apr 1;18(2):260-274. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxw045.
10
A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.一种基于S分布的用于连续诊断测试计算受试者工作特征曲线的新参数方法。
Stat Med. 2002 May 15;21(9):1213-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.1086.

引用本文的文献

1
Using patient self-reports to study heterogeneity of treatment effects in major depressive disorder.利用患者自我报告研究重度抑郁症治疗效果的异质性。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Feb;26(1):22-36. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000020. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
2
Testing a machine-learning algorithm to predict the persistence and severity of major depressive disorder from baseline self-reports.测试一种机器学习算法,以根据基线自我报告预测重度抑郁症的持续时间和严重程度。
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Oct;21(10):1366-71. doi: 10.1038/mp.2015.198. Epub 2016 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Permutation test for non-inferiority of the linear to the optimal combination of multiple tests.多个检验的线性组合与最优组合非劣效性的置换检验。
Stat Probab Lett. 2009 Mar 1;79(5):664-669. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2008.10.015.
2
The Optimal Linear Combination of Multiple Predictors Under the Generalized Linear Models.广义线性模型下多个预测变量的最优线性组合
Stat Probab Lett. 2009 Nov 15;79(22):2321-2327. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2009.08.002.
3
Accommodating Covariates in ROC Analysis.在ROC分析中纳入协变量。
Stata J. 2009 Jan 1;9(1):17-39.
4
A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.一种用于确定诊断测试的简单组合是否可能不劣于理论最优组合的程序。
Med Decis Making. 2008 Nov-Dec;28(6):909-16. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318462. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
5
The non-central chi2- and F-distributions and their applications.非中心卡方分布和F分布及其应用。
Biometrika. 1949 Jun;36(Pt. 1-2):202-32.
6
Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.用于对删失事件时间进行分类的多种诊断测试的稳健组合。
Biostatistics. 2008 Apr;9(2):216-33. doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm037. Epub 2007 Dec 3.
7
Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.评估新标志物的附加预测能力:从ROC曲线下面积到重新分类及其他。
Stat Med. 2008 Jan 30;27(2):157-72; discussion 207-12. doi: 10.1002/sim.2929.
8
Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death.用于预测首次重大心血管事件和死亡的多种生物标志物。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2631-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055373.
9
The limitations of risk factors as prognostic tools.风险因素作为预后工具的局限性。
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 21;355(25):2615-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068249.
10
Combining predictors for classification using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积来组合预测因子进行分类。
Biometrics. 2006 Mar;62(1):221-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00420.x.