Suppr超能文献

韩国阿德诺布鲁克认知评估修订版(K-ACER)用于阿尔茨海默病和皮质下缺血性血管性痴呆的鉴别诊断。

Korean Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (K-ACER) for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Hyoja Geriatric Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010 Oct;10(4):295-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00624.x. Epub 2010 May 17.

Abstract

AIM

Sensitive, specific neuropsychological screening tests, such as the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R), are essential for dementia diagnosis. We aimed to validate the use of the Korean version of ACE-R (K-ACER) to differentiate Alzheimer's disease (AD) from subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD).

METHODS

Standard tests for dementia screening were applied to 156 subjects (84 controls, 30 AD, 42 SIVD), and total and sub-domain scores on the K-ACER, as well as the sub-domain ratio (VLOM), were compared.

RESULTS

The reliability of the K-ACER was very good (α-coefficient 0.84), and cut-off score for dementia was determined (cut-off value 78, sensitivity 0.93, specificity 0.95). The likelihood ratio for dementia was calculated as between 78 and 82. At a cut-off of 78, the likelihood of dementia was 18.6:1. Although a comparison of K-ACER scores between AD and SIVD patients revealed significant differences in verbal fluency, language domain and VLOM ratio, sensitivity and specificity for differential diagnosis between AD and SVID proved less accurate.

CONCLUSION

The K-ACER is a rapid, sensitive and specific dementia screening test. Though sub-domains of items may be useful for differentiating between AD and SIVD, sensitivity and specificity is less accurate than dementia screening itself.

摘要

目的

阿登布鲁克认知测验修订版(ACE-R)等敏感、特异的神经心理学筛查测验对于痴呆症的诊断至关重要。本研究旨在验证韩国版 ACE-R(K-ACER)用于区分阿尔茨海默病(AD)与皮质下缺血性血管性痴呆(SIVD)的能力。

方法

对 156 名受试者(84 名对照,30 名 AD,42 名 SIVD)进行了标准的痴呆症筛查测试,并比较了 K-ACER 的总分和各亚域评分以及亚域比值(VLOM)。

结果

K-ACER 的可靠性非常好(α系数 0.84),并确定了痴呆症的截断值(截断值 78,敏感性 0.93,特异性 0.95)。痴呆症的似然比计算为 78 到 82 之间。在 78 的截断值下,痴呆症的可能性为 18.6:1。尽管 AD 和 SIVD 患者的 K-ACER 评分比较显示在词语流畅性、语言域和 VLOM 比值方面存在显著差异,但 AD 和 SVID 之间的鉴别诊断的敏感性和特异性准确性较低。

结论

K-ACER 是一种快速、敏感、特异的痴呆症筛查测试。虽然项目的亚域可能有助于区分 AD 和 SIVD,但敏感性和特异性不如痴呆症筛查本身准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验