Center for Environmental Biotechnology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-1605, USA.
Ground Water. 2011 Jan-Feb;49(1):53-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2010.00712.x.
The goal of this study was to test hollow-fiber ultrafiltration as a method for concentrating in situ bacteria and viruses in groundwater samples. Water samples from nine wells tapping a shallow sandy aquifer in a densely populated village in Bangladesh were reduced in volume approximately 400-fold using ultrafiltration. Culture-based assays for total coliforms and Escherichia coli, as well as molecular-based assays for E. coli, Bacteroides, and adenovirus, were used as microbial markers before and after ultrafiltration to evaluate performance. Ultrafiltration increased the concentration of the microbial markers in 99% of cases. However, concentration factors (CF = post-filtration concentration/pre-filtration concentration) for each marker calculated from geometric means ranged from 52 to 1018 compared to the expected value of 400. The efficiency was difficult to quantify because concentrations of some of the markers, especially E. coli and total coliforms, in the well water (WW) collected before ultrafiltration varied by several orders of magnitude during the period of sampling. The potential influence of colloidal iron oxide precipitates in the groundwater was tested by adding EDTA to the pre-filtration water in half of the samples to prevent the formation of precipitates. The use of EDTA had no significant effect on the measurement of culturable or molecular markers across the 0.5 to 10 mg/L range of dissolved Fe(2+) concentrations observed in the groundwater, indicating that colloidal iron did not hinder or enhance recovery or detection of the microbial markers. Ultrafiltration appears to be effective for concentrating microorganisms in environmental water samples, but additional research is needed to quantify losses during filtration.
本研究的目的是测试中空纤维超滤作为一种原位浓缩地下水样品中细菌和病毒的方法。来自孟加拉国一个人口稠密的村庄浅层砂含水层的 9 口井的水样通过超滤法浓缩约 400 倍。总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌的基于培养的检测以及大肠杆菌、拟杆菌和腺病毒的基于分子的检测,在超滤前后用作微生物标志物,以评估性能。超滤在 99%的情况下增加了微生物标志物的浓度。然而,从几何平均值计算的每个标记物的浓缩因子(CF = 过滤后浓度/过滤前浓度)范围为 52 至 1018,而预期值为 400。由于在采样期间,超滤前采集的井水(WW)中某些标记物(尤其是大肠杆菌和总大肠菌群)的浓度变化了几个数量级,因此难以定量效率。通过在一半的样品中向预过滤水中添加 EDTA 来测试地下水中铁胶体氧化物沉淀物的潜在影响,以防止沉淀物的形成。EDTA 的使用对在观察到的地下水 0.5 至 10mg/L 范围内的溶解 Fe(2+)浓度下可培养或分子标记物的测量没有显著影响,表明胶体铁不会阻碍或增强微生物标记物的回收或检测。超滤似乎可有效浓缩环境水样中的微生物,但需要进一步研究以量化过滤过程中的损失。