• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 Sprint Fidelis 导联修复相关的并发症:来自加拿大心律学会器械咨询委员会的报告。

Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.

机构信息

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia.

出版信息

Circulation. 2010 Jun 8;121(22):2384-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924357. Epub 2010 May 24.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924357
PMID:20497979
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been observed that replacement of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator in response to a device advisory may be associated with a substantial rate of complications, including death. The risk of lead revision in response to a lead advisory has not been determined previously.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-five implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation and follow-up centers from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee were surveyed to assess complication rates as a result of lead revisions due to the Sprint Fidelis advisory issued in October 2007. As of June 1, 2009, there had been 310 lead failures found in 6237 Sprint Fidelis leads in Canada (4.97%) over a follow-up of 40 months. There were 469 leads to be revised, 66% for confirmed fracture. Of the patients who underwent revision, 95% had a new lead inserted, whereas 4% had a pace/sense lead added. The lead was removed in 248 cases (53%), by simple traction in 61% and by laser lead extraction in 33%. Complications were encountered in 14.5% of the lead revisions; 7.25% of these were major, whereas 7.25% were minor. There were 2 deaths (0.43%). The overall risk of complications (19.8%) was greater in those who underwent lead removal at the time of revision than in those whose leads were abandoned (8.6%; P=0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall rate of major complications that arose from lead revision due to the Sprint Fidelis advisory was significant. This must be taken into account when lead revision is planned in those patients who have not yet demonstrated an abnormality in lead performance.

摘要

背景

据观察,针对器械建议更换植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)的发生器可能会导致并发症发生率较高,包括死亡。针对器械建议更换导线的风险此前尚未确定。

方法和结果

来自加拿大心律学会器械建议委员会的 25 个 ICD 植入和随访中心接受调查,以评估因 2007 年 10 月发布的 Sprint Fidelis 器械建议而进行的导线修订导致的并发症发生率。截至 2009 年 6 月 1 日,加拿大共 6237 根 Sprint Fidelis 导线中有 310 根(4.97%)发生导线故障,随访时间为 40 个月。需要修订 469 根导线,66%为证实的导线断裂。接受修订的患者中,95%植入了新的导线,4%添加了起搏/感知导线。248 例(53%)导线被移除,61%通过简单牵引,33%通过激光导丝提取。导线修订中有 14.5%出现并发症;7.25%为严重并发症,7.25%为轻微并发症。有 2 例死亡(0.43%)。在修订时进行导线移除的患者中,并发症发生率(19.8%)高于放弃导线的患者(8.6%;P=0.0008)。

结论

因 Sprint Fidelis 器械建议而进行的导线修订引起的严重并发症发生率较高。在那些尚未出现导线性能异常的患者中计划进行导线修订时,必须考虑到这一点。

相似文献

1
Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.与 Sprint Fidelis 导联修复相关的并发症:来自加拿大心律学会器械咨询委员会的报告。
Circulation. 2010 Jun 8;121(22):2384-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.924357. Epub 2010 May 24.
2
Letter by Maytin and Epstein et al regarding article, "Complications associated with revision of Sprint Fidelis leads: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee".梅廷和爱泼斯坦等人就文章《斯普林特菲德利斯导线翻修相关并发症:加拿大心律学会器械咨询委员会报告》所写的信函。
Circulation. 2011 Mar 15;123(10):e375. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.972851.
3
Outcome of the Fidelis implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead advisory: a report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.菲德利斯植入式心脏复律除颤器导线咨询的结果:加拿大心律学会设备咨询委员会的报告。
Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
4
Biventricular defibrillator patients have higher complication rates after revision of recalled leads.双心室除颤器患者在召回导线修复后并发症发生率更高。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):665-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03401.x. Epub 2012 Apr 22.
5
Clinical predictors of Fidelis lead failure: report from the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Committee.菲德利斯导线故障的临床预测因素:加拿大心律学会器械委员会报告。
Circulation. 2012 Mar 13;125(10):1217-25. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.053744. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
6
Inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks in fractured Sprint Fidelis leads associated with 'appropriate' interrogation.在与“恰当”问询相关的 Sprint Fidelis 导线断裂情况下,植入式心律转复除颤器出现不恰当电击。
Europace. 2008 Jun;10(6):726-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eun113. Epub 2008 May 1.
7
Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry.与起搏器或植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)发生器更换和升级手术相关的并发症发生率:REPLACE 注册研究结果。
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16):1553-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976076. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
8
Update on small-diameter implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads performance.小直径植入式心脏复律除颤器导线性能的最新进展。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Jun;35(6):652-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03338.x. Epub 2012 Feb 21.
9
Utilization of a national network for rapid response to the Medtronic Fidelis lead advisory: the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Device Advisory Committee.
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Apr;6(4):474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.01.012. Epub 2009 Jan 18.
10
Patient-reported outcomes in Danish implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with a Sprint Fidelis lead advisory notification.丹麦植入式心律转复除颤器患者的患者报告结局,该患者存在 Sprint Fidelis 导联警示通知。
Europace. 2011 Sep;13(9):1292-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur157. Epub 2011 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Success and Complication Rates of Transvenous Lead Extraction in a Developing High-Volume Extraction Center: The Zurich Experience.一个发展中的高容量心脏起搏器导线拔除中心的经静脉导线拔除成功率及并发症发生率:苏黎世经验
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 14;12(6):2260. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062260.
2
A Policy Approach to Reducing Low-Value Device-Based Procedure Use.一种降低低值器械为基础的治疗方法使用率的政策方法。
Milbank Q. 2022 Dec;100(4):1006-1027. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12595. Epub 2022 Dec 27.
3
Seal plug damage causing inappropriate detection and therapy in a subcutaneous defibrillator system.
皮下除颤器系统中密封插头损坏导致检测和治疗不当。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2018 Aug 28;5(2):66-69. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2018.02.013. eCollection 2019 Feb.
4
Riata lead up to date.Riata导线的最新情况。
J Cardiol Cases. 2017 Feb 1;15(2):70-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2016.10.017. eCollection 2017 Feb.
5
Creation of the sole regional laser lead extraction program serving Atlantic Canada: initial experience.创建服务于加拿大大西洋地区的唯一区域性激光导线拔除项目:初步经验
Can J Surg. 2016 Jun;59(3):180-7. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011115.
6
Use and Abuse of Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention.植入式心律转复除颤器用于一级预防的应用与滥用
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2012 Sep;1(1):46-50. doi: 10.15420/aer.2012.1.46.
7
Troubleshooting during a challenging high-risk pacemaker lead extraction: a case report and review of the literature.高风险起搏器导线取出术的故障排除:一例病例报告及文献综述
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Mar 25;8:94. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1034-y.
8
Managing patients with advisory defibrillator leads: what can we learn from published data?管理带有建议性除颤器导线的患者:我们能从已发表的数据中学到什么?
Neth Heart J. 2015 Apr;23(4):199-204. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0669-6.
9
Generator and lead-related complications of implantable cardioverter defibrillators.植入式心脏复律除颤器的发生器及导线相关并发症
Int Cardiovasc Res J. 2014 Apr;8(2):66-70. Epub 2014 Apr 1.
10
Dual- versus single-coil implantable defibrillator leads: review of the literature.双线圈与单线圈植入式除颤器导线:文献回顾。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 Apr;101(4):239-45. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0407-z. Epub 2012 Jan 10.