Krahn Andrew D, Champagne Jean, Healey Jeffrey S, Cameron Doug, Simpson Christopher S, Thibault Bernard, Mangat Iqwal, Tung Stanley, Sterns Laurence, Birnie David H, Exner Derek V, Parkash Ratika, Sivakumaran Soori, Davies Ted, Coutu Benoit, Crystal Eugene, Wolfe Kevin, Verma Atul, Stephenson Elizabeth A, Sanatani Shubhayan, Gow Robert, Connors Sean, Paredes Felix Ayala, Essebag Vidal
London Health Sciences Center, University Campus, 339 Windermere Road, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 5A5.
Heart Rhythm. 2008 May;5(5):639-42. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.01.029. Epub 2008 Jan 29.
The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis family of leads has recently been the subject of a widespread advisory. Lead failure rates are estimated at 2.3% at 30 months, 2.6 times the failure rate of the reference Medtronic 6947 lead.
The purpose of this study was to contact pediatric and adult implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implant centers across Canada to determine the short-term response to the October 15, 2007 Medtronic Fidelis lead advisory.
All centers completed an 11-part survey to assess the frequency and presentation of lead failure, operator characteristics, and center's response.
Lead failure was noted in 80 (1.29%) of 6,181 patients at 21.0 months, with inappropriate shocks experienced in 45 (56%) of the 80 patients (overall risk 0.73%). No deaths were attributed to lead failure. Sensing was the primary form of failure, seen in 60 leads (75%), with pacing failure in 10 (13%), and high-voltage failure in 15 (19%). Assessment of the previous routine ICD interrogation prior to the advisory or lead failure demonstrated evidence of altered lead performance in only 8 (10%) of the 80 leads. Inappropriate shocks typically were multiple (median 7, range 1-122), with a single shock seen in only 5 patients. Lead failure was noted in 18 of 23 centers, representing 89.8% of leads implanted, with at least one failure noted in 15 of 16 centers that implanted more than 200 leads. Forty-seven of the 135 operators in the 23 institutions implanted the 80 leads that subsequently failed. Only 16 operators were involved in more than a single lead that subsequently failed; seven operators participated in three or more leads that subsequently failed. Seven centers planned to replace leads in most pacing-dependent patients, and two centers planned to replace leads in patients unable to hear the alert tone.
This national experience suggests a Fidelis lead failure rate of 1.29% at 21 months, most often presenting with multiple inappropriate shocks without evidence of impending failure from routine lead follow-up. Lead failure did not appear to cluster around specific operators or around high-volume or low-volume implant centers.
美敦力Sprint Fidelis系列导线最近受到广泛关注。据估计,30个月时导线故障率为2.3%,是对照美敦力6947导线故障率的2.6倍。
本研究旨在联系加拿大各地的儿科和成人植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入中心,以确定对2007年10月15日美敦力Fidelis导线关注的短期反应。
所有中心完成了一项包含11部分的调查,以评估导线故障的频率和表现、操作人员特征以及中心的反应。
在6181例患者中的80例(1.29%)在21.0个月时出现导线故障,其中80例患者中有45例(56%)经历了不适当电击(总体风险0.73%)。没有死亡归因于导线故障。感知是主要的故障形式,60根导线(75%)出现此故障,10根(13%)出现起搏故障,15根(19%)出现高压故障。对关注或导线故障前的常规ICD程控进行评估显示,80根导线中只有8根(10%)有导线性能改变的证据。不适当电击通常为多次(中位数7次,范围1 - 122次),只有5例患者出现单次电击。23个中心中有18个中心出现导线故障,占植入导线的89.8%,在植入超过200根导线的16个中心中,有15个中心至少出现1例故障。23个机构的135名操作人员中有47名植入了随后发生故障的80根导线。只有16名操作人员涉及不止一根随后发生故障的导线;7名操作人员参与了三根或更多随后发生故障的导线。7个中心计划为大多数依赖起搏的患者更换导线,2个中心计划为无法听到警报音的患者更换导线。
这项全国性经验表明,Fidelis导线在21个月时的故障率为1.29%,最常见的表现是多次不适当电击,且常规导线随访未显示即将发生故障的迹象。导线故障似乎没有集中在特定操作人员周围,也没有集中在高植入量或低植入量的植入中心周围。