Saba Luca, Mallarini Giorgio
Department of Radiology, Policlinico Universitario, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2010 May-Jun;34(3):421-30. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d0f640.
The purpose of this study was to compare 3 percentage carotid artery measurement methods (the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial [NASCET], the European Carotid Surgery Trial [ECST], and the Carotid Stenosis Index [CSI]) and 1 millimeter method (direct millimeter measurement) to evaluate the difference and correlation between them.
Seven hundred ninety-two patients (591 men; age: mean, 63 years; range, 32-91 years) studied by using a multi-detector row computed tomographic scanner for a total of 1584 carotid arteries were retrospectively analyzed. Each carotid stenosis was measured according to 4 measurement methods (the NASCET, the ECST, the CSI, and the direct millimeter measurement). Carotid arteries with near-occlusion condition were excluded. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z test was used to test the normality of continuous variable groups. Comparison of derived ratio-percent methods was performed by using the Bland-Altman plots, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. Correlation coefficients were also calculated by using a nonparametric Spearman correlation. A P < 0.05 was considered to mean statistical significance.
Four hundred sixteen carotid arteries were excluded, and in the remaining 1168 ones, a strength correlation according to quadratic regression between the NASCET and ECST methods was observed (Spearman rho coefficient, 0.948; P < 0.0001). An inverse correlation according to linear regression was observed between the NASCET and the direct millimeter measurement (Spearman rho coefficient, -0.972; P < 0.0001); the CSI shows a quadratic regression with the NASCET, a linear regression with the ECST, and an inverse linear regression with the direct millimeter measurement (Spearman rho coefficient, 0.946, 0.932, and -0.939 respectively). The cutoff values for 50% and 70% NASCET stenosis were 2.36 and 1.51, respectively.
Our study results indicate that the direct millimeter measurement of stenosis, by using appropriate equations, can reliably predict NASCET-, ECST-, and CSI-type percent stenoses. The use of direct millimeter measurement may remove the pitfalls and the discrepancies deriving from the use of different ratio-percent methods.
本研究旨在比较三种颈动脉测量百分比方法(北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验 [NASCET]、欧洲颈动脉外科试验 [ECST] 和颈动脉狭窄指数 [CSI])与一种毫米测量方法(直接毫米测量),以评估它们之间的差异和相关性。
回顾性分析了792例患者(591例男性;年龄:平均63岁;范围32 - 91岁),这些患者使用多排探测器计算机断层扫描仪共研究了1584条颈动脉。每条颈动脉狭窄均按照4种测量方法(NASCET、ECST、CSI和直接毫米测量)进行测量。排除接近闭塞状态的颈动脉。采用柯尔莫哥洛夫 - 斯米尔诺夫Z检验来检验连续变量组的正态性。使用布兰德 - 奥特曼图对推导的比率百分比方法进行比较,并计算受试者工作特征曲线。还使用非参数斯皮尔曼相关性计算相关系数。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
排除了416条颈动脉,在其余1168条中,观察到NASCET和ECST方法之间基于二次回归的强相关性(斯皮尔曼rho系数,0.948;P < 0.0001)。观察到NASCET与直接毫米测量之间基于线性回归的负相关性(斯皮尔曼rho系数, - 0.972;P < 0.0001);CSI与NASCET呈二次回归,与ECST呈线性回归,与直接毫米测量呈负线性回归(斯皮尔曼rho系数分别为0.946、0.932和 - 0.939)。NASCET狭窄50%和70%时的截断值分别为2.36和1.51。
我们的研究结果表明,通过使用适当的公式,直接毫米测量狭窄能够可靠地预测NASCET、ECST和CSI类型的狭窄百分比。直接毫米测量的使用可能消除因使用不同比率百分比方法而产生的缺陷和差异。