Department of Radiology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, 06590 Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun;28(5):1257-66. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9939-6. Epub 2011 Aug 21.
Purpose is to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver variability of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET), European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) and Common Carotid (CC) methods, which are used to measure the degree of ICA stenosis, using 64-slice CT angiography and to compare the measurements made by these three methods. 88 cases (111 carotid arteries) were included in the study. Carotid CTA was performed by a 64 slice scanner (Toshiba, Aqullion 64).Two radiologists measured the degree of carotid stenosis by using NASCET, ECST and CC methods. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of each method was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman plots and kappa and linear weighted kappa statistics. The relation between the measurements was assessed by correlation coefficient (with linear and quadratic methods). Correlation coefficients showed that there is linear correlation between the measurements made by the three methods. The degree of stenosis measured with the NASCET method had the lowest value, while the corresponding values measured with the ECST and CC methods were close to each other. ICC and Bland-Altman plots showed high intra and inter observer agreement for NASCET, ECST and CC methods whereas kappa statistics showed moderate to substantial agreement. CC method had slightly higher agreement when compared with the other two methods. Intra and interobserver agreement is high for NASCET, ECST and CC methods however CC method has a slightly higher reproducibility. There is linear correlation between the measurements made by the three methods.
目的是评估北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)、欧洲颈动脉外科试验(ECST)和普通颈动脉(CC)方法的观察者内和观察者间变异性,这些方法用于测量 ICA 狭窄程度,使用 64 层 CT 血管造影,并比较这三种方法的测量结果。研究纳入 88 例(111 条颈动脉)患者。颈动脉 CTA 由 64 层扫描仪(东芝,Aqullion 64)进行。两位放射科医生使用 NASCET、ECST 和 CC 方法测量颈动脉狭窄程度。通过组内相关系数(ICC)、Bland-Altman 图和 Kappa 和线性加权 Kappa 统计来确定每种方法的观察者内和观察者间变异性。通过相关系数(线性和二次方法)评估测量值之间的关系。相关系数表明,三种方法的测量值之间存在线性相关。NASCET 方法测量的狭窄程度值最低,而 ECST 和 CC 方法测量的相应值彼此接近。ICC 和 Bland-Altman 图表明 NASCET、ECST 和 CC 方法具有较高的观察者内和观察者间一致性,而 Kappa 统计表明具有中度至高度一致性。与其他两种方法相比,CC 方法具有更高的一致性。NASCET、ECST 和 CC 方法的观察者内和观察者间一致性均较高,但 CC 方法的可重复性略高。三种方法的测量值之间存在线性相关性。