Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
J Urban Health. 2010 Jul;87(4):688-702. doi: 10.1007/s11524-010-9465-1.
Asthma disproportionately affects non-whites in urban areas and those of low socioeconomic status, yet asthma's social patterning is not well-explained by known risk factors. We hypothesized that disadvantaged urban populations experience acute and chronic housing stressors which produce psychological stress and impact health through biological and behavioral pathways. We examined eight outcomes: six child respiratory outcomes as well as parent and child general health, using data from 682 low-income, Chicago parents of diagnosed and undiagnosed asthmatic children. We created a continuous exposure, representing material, social and emotional dimensions of housing stressors, weighted by their parent-reported difficulty. We compared the 75th to the 25th quartile of exposure in adjusted binomial and negative binomial regression models. Higher risks and rates of poor health were associated with higher housing stressors for six of eight outcomes. The risk difference (RD) for poor/fair general health was larger for children [RD = 6.28 (95% CI 1.22, 11.35)] than for parents [RD = 3.88 (95% CI -1.87, 9.63)]. The incidence rate difference (IRD) for exercise intolerance was nearly one extra day per 2 weeks for the higher exposure group [IRD = 0.88 (95% CI 0.41, 1.35)]; nearly one-third extra day per 2 weeks for waking at night [IRD = 0.32 (95% CI 0.01, 0.63)]; and nearly one-third extra day per 6 months for unplanned medical visits [IRD = 0.30 (95% CI 0.059, 0.54)]. Results contribute to the conceptualization of urban stress as a "social pollutant" and to the hypothesized role of stress in health disparities. Interventions to improve asthma outcomes must address individuals' reactions to stress while we seek structural solutions to residential stressors and health inequities.
哮喘在城市地区和社会经济地位较低的非白人中不成比例地影响,但哮喘的社会模式并不能很好地用已知的风险因素来解释。我们假设,处于不利地位的城市人口会经历急性和慢性住房压力源,这些压力源会通过生理和行为途径产生心理压力并影响健康。我们检查了八个结果:六个儿童呼吸结果以及父母和儿童的一般健康状况,使用了 682 名芝加哥低收入、有诊断和未诊断哮喘儿童的父母的数据。我们创建了一个连续的暴露量,代表住房压力源的物质、社会和情感维度,按其父母报告的困难程度加权。我们在调整后的二项式和负二项式回归模型中比较了暴露量的第 75 分位数和第 25 分位数。对于八个结果中的六个,较高的住房压力与更高的健康不良风险和更高的比率相关。对于儿童来说,一般健康状况不佳/一般的风险差异(RD)更大[RD=6.28(95%置信区间 1.22,11.35)],而对于父母来说,RD 较小[RD=3.88(95%置信区间-1.87,9.63)]。对于运动不耐受,较高暴露组每两周多一天的发病率差异(IRD)[IRD=0.88(95%置信区间 0.41,1.35)];每晚醒来的时间多一天多两周[IRD=0.32(95%置信区间 0.01,0.63)];计划外医疗就诊每六个月多一天[IRD=0.30(95%置信区间 0.059,0.54)]。结果有助于将城市压力概念化为“社会污染物”,并假设压力在健康差异中的作用。为了改善哮喘结果,干预措施必须解决个人对压力的反应,同时我们寻求解决住房压力源和健康不平等的结构性解决方案。