Department of Dermatology, Division of Connective Tissue Disease and Autoimmunity, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Turumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Sep;49(9):1726-33. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keq153. Epub 2010 May 25.
Myositis-specific autoantibodies are useful for diagnosing PM/DM. Recently, two new myositis-specific autoantibodies against melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) and transcriptional intermediary factor 1-gamma (TIF1-gamma) were identified in DM. Here, we detected these autoantibodies in patient sera using new assays with recombinant MDA5 and TIF1-gamma, and associated clinical features with the presence of anti-MDA5 or anti-TIF1-gamma antibodies.
We screened 135 Japanese patients with various CTDs, including 82 with DM. DM patients were classified as clinically amyopathic DM (CADM), cancer-associated DM or classical DM without cancer. Anti-MDA5 and anti-TIF1-gamma antibodies were detected by their ability to immunoprecipitate biotinylated recombinant proteins.
Sera from 21 (26%) of 82 DM patients immunoprecipitated MDA5, and every anti-MDA5-positive patient had DM (except one patient with SSc). Sera from 20 (65%) of 31 CADM patients reacted with MDA5. Notably, anti-MDA5-positive DM patients had significantly more interstitial lung disease than anti-MDA5-negative DM patients (95 vs 32%, P < 0.001). Sera from 12 (15%) of 82 DM patients immunoprecipitated TIF1-gamma, and anti-TIF1-gamma antibodies were only detected in DM patients. Strikingly, 7 (58%) of 12 patients with cancer-associated DM had sera that reacted with TIF1-gamma. Anti-TIF1-gamma-positive DM patients had significantly more internal malignancies than anti-TIF1-gamma-negative DM patients (58 vs 9%, P < 0.001).
Anti-MDA5 and anti-TIF1-gamma antibodies were confirmed to be serological DM subset markers. Anti-MDA5 and anti-TIF1-gamma antibodies were detected based on their ability to immunoprecipitate biotinylated recombinant MDA5 and TIF1-gamma, and were closely associated with life-threatening complications in DM.
肌炎特异性自身抗体有助于肌炎/皮肌炎的诊断。最近,两种新的肌炎特异性自身抗体——抗黑色素瘤分化相关基因 5(MDA5)和转录中介因子 1-γ(TIF1-γ)在皮肌炎中被发现。在此,我们使用新的重组 MDA5 和 TIF1-γ检测试剂盒,对患者血清中的这些自身抗体进行检测,并将其与抗 MDA5 或抗 TIF1-γ抗体的存在与临床特征相关联。
我们筛选了 135 例日本各种结缔组织疾病患者,包括 82 例皮肌炎患者。皮肌炎患者分为临床无肌病性皮肌炎(CADM)、癌症相关皮肌炎或无癌症的经典皮肌炎。通过生物素化重组蛋白的免疫沉淀能力检测抗 MDA5 和抗 TIF1-γ抗体。
82 例皮肌炎患者中有 21 例(26%)的血清能沉淀 MDA5,且每例抗 MDA5 阳性患者均为皮肌炎(除 1 例为硬皮病患者外)。31 例 CADM 患者中有 20 例(65%)的血清与 MDA5 反应。值得注意的是,抗 MDA5 阳性皮肌炎患者的间质性肺病明显多于抗 MDA5 阴性皮肌炎患者(95% vs. 32%,P < 0.001)。82 例皮肌炎患者中有 12 例(15%)的血清能沉淀 TIF1-γ,且抗 TIF1-γ 抗体仅在皮肌炎患者中检测到。引人注目的是,12 例癌症相关皮肌炎患者中有 7 例(58%)的血清与 TIF1-γ反应。抗 TIF1-γ 阳性皮肌炎患者的内脏恶性肿瘤明显多于抗 TIF1-γ 阴性皮肌炎患者(58% vs. 9%,P < 0.001)。
抗 MDA5 和抗 TIF1-γ 抗体被证实为肌炎的血清亚型标志物。基于生物素化重组 MDA5 和 TIF1-γ 的免疫沉淀能力检测抗 MDA5 和抗 TIF1-γ 抗体,与皮肌炎的致命性并发症密切相关。