Department of Chemistry and Environmental Sciences, Lake Superior State University, 650 W Easterday Ave, Sault Ste Marie, MI 49783, USA.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010 Jul;397(5):1705-14. doi: 10.1007/s00216-010-3709-5. Epub 2010 May 26.
This review focuses on the efficiency of different water treatment processes for the removal of cyanotoxins from potable water. Although several investigators have studied full-scale drinking water processes to determine the efficiency of cyanotoxin inactivation, many of the studies were based on ancillary practice. In this context, "ancillary practice" refers to the removal or inactivation of cyanotoxins by standard daily operational procedures and without a contingency operational plan utilizing specific treatment barriers. In this review, "auxiliary practice" refers to the implementation of inactivation/removal treatment barriers or operational changes explicitly designed to minimize risk from toxin-forming algae and their toxins to make potable water. Furthermore, the best drinking water treatment practices are based on extension of the multibarrier approach to remove cyanotoxins from water. Cyanotoxins are considered natural contaminants that occur worldwide and specific classes of cyanotoxins have shown regional prevalence. For example, freshwaters in the Americas often show high concentrations of microcystin, anatoxin-a, and cylindrospermopsin, whereas Australian water sources often show high concentrations of microcystin, cylindrospermopsin, and saxitoxins. Other less frequently reported cyanotoxins include lyngbyatoxin A, debromoaplysiatoxin, and beta-N-methylamino-L-alanine. This review focuses on the commonly used unit processes and treatment trains to reduce the toxicity of four classes of cyanotoxins: the microcystins, cylindrospermopsin, anatoxin-a, and saxitoxins. The goal of this review is to inform the reader of how each unit process participates in a treatment train and how an auxiliary multibarrier approach to water treatment can provide safer water for the consumer.
本综述重点介绍了不同水处理工艺去除饮用水中蓝藻毒素的效率。尽管有几位研究人员研究了饮用水处理的全规模工艺,以确定蓝藻毒素失活的效率,但许多研究都是基于辅助实践。在这种情况下,“辅助实践”是指通过标准的日常操作程序和没有利用特定处理障碍的应急操作计划来去除或失活蓝藻毒素。在本综述中,“辅助实践”是指实施灭活/去除处理障碍或操作变更,这些变更明确旨在最大限度地减少形成藻毒素的藻类及其毒素对饮用水造成的风险。此外,最佳饮用水处理实践是基于扩展多屏障方法,从水中去除蓝藻毒素。蓝藻毒素被认为是全世界存在的天然污染物,特定类别的蓝藻毒素具有区域性流行。例如,美洲的淡水通常含有高浓度的微囊藻毒素、anatoxin-a 和柱孢藻毒素,而澳大利亚的水源通常含有高浓度的微囊藻毒素、柱孢藻毒素和石房蛤毒素。其他报告较少的蓝藻毒素包括 lyngbyatoxin A、debromoaplysiatoxin 和β-N-甲基氨基-L-丙氨酸。本综述重点介绍了常用的单元工艺和处理列车,以降低四类蓝藻毒素的毒性:微囊藻毒素、柱孢藻毒素、anatoxin-a 和石房蛤毒素。本综述的目的是让读者了解每个单元工艺如何参与处理列车,以及辅助的多屏障水处理方法如何为消费者提供更安全的水。