Department Neuropsychology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Oct;20(5):704-24. doi: 10.1080/09602011003737087. Epub 2010 May 1.
Unilateral neglect is a multifaceted disorder. Many authors have, for this reason, speculated that the best treatment for neglect will involve combinations of different therapeutic techniques. Two well-known interventions, neck vibration (NV) and prism adaptation (PA), have often been considered to be among the most effective treatments for neglect. Here, two experiments were performed to explore possible additive benefits when these interventions are used in combination to treat chronic neglect. Both experimental groups received NV for 20 minutes, while the second group received simultaneous PA. The effects of treatment were measured with a time-restricted and feedback-based visual search task, which has previously been found to abolish the beneficial effects of PA, and with standard neglect tests. Baseline and intervention measures were performed on separate days. Findings for both groups indicated improved visual search following intervention, but the patients that underwent the combined intervention (NVPA) showed clear improvements on visual search paper and pencil neglect tests unlike the NV-only group. Overall, our results suggest that PA strengthens the effects of NV and that feedback-based tasks do not abolish the beneficial effects of PA, when NV is applied simultaneously. The results support the view that the most effective treatment for neglect will involve the combination of different treatments.
单侧忽略是一种多方面的障碍。许多作者因此推测,针对忽略的最佳治疗方法将涉及多种治疗技术的组合。两种众所周知的干预措施,颈部振动(NV)和棱镜适应(PA),通常被认为是治疗忽略的最有效方法之一。在这里,进行了两项实验来探索这些干预措施结合使用时是否具有附加的益处,以治疗慢性忽略。两个实验组都接受了 20 分钟的 NV,而第二组同时接受了 PA。治疗效果通过限时和基于反馈的视觉搜索任务进行测量,该任务先前已被发现可以消除 PA 的有益效果,并且可以使用标准忽略测试进行测量。基线和干预措施在不同的日子进行。结果表明,两组患者在干预后视觉搜索能力都有所提高,但接受联合干预(NVPA)的患者在视觉搜索纸笔忽略测试中表现出明显的改善,而仅接受 NV 治疗的患者则没有。总的来说,我们的结果表明,PA 增强了 NV 的效果,并且当同时应用 NV 时,基于反馈的任务不会消除 PA 的有益效果。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即针对忽略的最有效治疗方法将涉及多种治疗方法的组合。