• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国传染病学会莱姆病审查小组的最终报告。

Final report of the Lyme disease review panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

机构信息

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 1;51(1):1-5. doi: 10.1086/654809.

DOI:10.1086/654809
PMID:20504239
Abstract

In April 2008, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) entered into an agreement with Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal to voluntarily undertake a special review of its 2006 Lyme disease guidelines. This agreement ended the Attorney General's investigation into the process by which the guidelines were developed. The IDSA agreed to convene an independent panel to conduct a one-time review of the guidelines. The Review Panel members, vetted by an ombudsman for potential conflicts of interest, reviewed the entirety of the 2006 guidelines, with particular attention to the recommendations devoted to post-Lyme disease syndromes. After multiple meetings, a public hearing, and extensive review of research and other information, the Review Panel concluded that the recommendations contained in the 2006 guidelines were medically and scientifically justified on the basis of all of the available evidence and that no changes to the guidelines were necessary.

摘要

2008 年 4 月,美国传染病学会(IDSA)与康涅狄格州总检察长理查德·布卢门撒尔达成协议,自愿对其 2006 年莱姆病指南进行特别审查。该协议结束了总检察长对指南制定过程的调查。IDSA 同意召集一个独立小组对指南进行一次性审查。审查小组成员由监察员审查潜在利益冲突,对 2006 年指南的全部内容进行了审查,特别关注专门针对莱姆病后综合征的建议。经过多次会议、公开听证会以及对研究和其他信息的广泛审查,审查小组得出结论,根据所有现有证据,2006 年指南中的建议在医学和科学上是合理的,无需对指南进行任何更改。

相似文献

1
Final report of the Lyme disease review panel of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.美国传染病学会莱姆病审查小组的最终报告。
Clin Infect Dis. 2010 Jul 1;51(1):1-5. doi: 10.1086/654809.
2
Attorney General forces Infectious Diseases Society of America to redo Lyme guidelines due to flawed development process.美国总检察长因开发过程存在缺陷,迫使美国传染病学会重新制定莱姆病指南。
J Med Ethics. 2009 May;35(5):283-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.2008.026526.
3
In the lymelight: law and clinical practice guidelines.备受关注:法律与临床实践指南。
South Med J. 2009 Jun;102(6):626-30. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181a5dcce.
4
Clarification of the Agreement between the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Attorney General of Connecticut.美国传染病学会与康涅狄格州总检察长之间协议的澄清。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 1;47(9):1200. doi: 10.1086/592248.
5
Scientific evidence and best patient care practices should guide the ethics of Lyme disease activism.科学证据和最佳患者护理实践应指导莱姆病活动的伦理。
J Med Ethics. 2011 Feb;37(2):68-73. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.032896. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
6
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Lyme guidelines: a cautionary tale about the development of clinical practice guidelines.美国传染病学会莱姆病指南:一个关于临床实践指南制定的警示故事。
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2010 Jun 9;5:9. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-5-9.
7
Danger ahead: politics intrude in Infectious Diseases Society of America guideline for Lyme disease.前方危险:政治介入美国传染病学会关于莱姆病的指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Nov 1;47(9):1197-9. doi: 10.1086/592247.
8
Cure unwanted? Exploring the chronic Lyme disease controversy and why conflicts of interest in practice guidelines may be guiding us down the wrong path.治愈不受欢迎?探索慢性莱姆病争议以及为何实践指南中的利益冲突可能将我们引向错误的道路。
Am J Law Med. 2012;38(1):196-224.
9
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Lyme guidelines: poster child for guidelines reform.美国传染病学会莱姆病指南:指南改革的典型代表。
South Med J. 2009 Jun;102(6):565-6. doi: 10.1097/SMJ.0b013e3181a594e9.
10
IDSA issues guidelines on the treatment of Lyme disease. Infectious Diseases Society of America.美国传染病学会发布莱姆病治疗指南。美国传染病学会。
Am Fam Physician. 2001 May 15;63(10):2065, 2067.

引用本文的文献

1
Not bitten by Ixodes ticks or bitten without symptoms, why still to worry?没有被硬蜱叮咬或虽有叮咬但无明显症状,为什么还要担心?
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2024 Sep;32(3):173-177. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a8114.
2
Lyme Disease and Post-treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome: Current and Developing Treatment Options.莱姆病及治疗后莱姆病综合征:当前及正在发展的治疗选择
Cureus. 2023 Aug 8;15(8):e43112. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43112. eCollection 2023 Aug.
3
Ten-year-old Omani Girl with Lyme Arthritis.患有莱姆关节炎的10岁阿曼女孩。
Oman Med J. 2022 Nov 30;37(6):e446. doi: 10.5001/omj.2022.31. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Énoncé de position de l'AMMI Canada sur le diagnostic de la maladie de Lyme et le traitement des personnes ayant des symptômes persistants attribués à cette maladie.加拿大医学微生物学与传染病协会(AMMI Canada)关于莱姆病诊断及对有归因于该病的持续症状者治疗的立场声明。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2019 Jun 17;4(2):47-50. doi: 10.3138/jammi.2019.03.17.fr. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
AMMI Canada position statement on the diagnosis and treatment of people with persistent symptoms that have been attributed to Lyme disease.加拿大AMMI关于对已归因于莱姆病的持续性症状患者的诊断和治疗的立场声明。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2019 Jun 17;4(2):43-46. doi: 10.3138/jammi.2019.03.17.eng. eCollection 2019 Jun.
6
Lymelight: forecasting Lyme disease risk using web search data.Lymelight:利用网络搜索数据预测莱姆病风险。
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 4;3:16. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0222-x. eCollection 2020.
7
Differentiating Psychosomatic, Somatopsychic, Multisystem Illnesses, and Medical Uncertainty.区分心身疾病、身心疾病、多系统疾病及医学不确定性。
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Oct 8;7(4):114. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7040114.
8
A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2018 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society for Microbiology.临床微生物实验室诊断感染性疾病的应用指南:美国传染病学会和美国微生物学会 2018 年更新版。
Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 31;67(6):e1-e94. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy381.
9
"Late You Come: Legislation on Lyme Treatment in an Era of Conflicting Guidelines".你来晚了:指南冲突时代的莱姆病治疗立法
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 20;4(4):ofx152. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx152. eCollection 2017 Fall.
10
Lyme borreliosis.莱姆病。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016 Dec 15;2:16090. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.90.