Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Aug;29(8):961-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-010-0952-9. Epub 2010 May 27.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rifampin for Staphylococcus aureus (SA) or coagulase negative staphylococci (CNS) prosthetic joint infection (PJI) treated with debridement and retention (D/R). We calculated the treatment failure cumulative incidence (TF) of a cohort of 101 patients with SA or CNS PJI treated with D/R and antimicrobial therapy. The effect of the use of a rifampin-based regimen was evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the association between treatment and time-to-TF controlling for the propensity to treat with rifampin and temporal confounders. Seven percent (1/14) of the prospective rifampin-treated patients, 32% (10/31) of the historical rifampin-treated patients and 38% (21/56) of the historical non-rifampin treated patients developed TF. After controlling for the propensity to treat with rifampin and American Society of Anesthesia scores, patients in the prospective cohort had a lower risk of TF compared to patients in the historical cohort not treated with rifampin (HR 0.11; 95%CI 0.01-0.84). None (0/14) of the patients in the prospective study developed hepatotoxicity. The outcome of staphylococcal PJI treated with D/R and rifampin-based regimens was better when compared with a historical cohort treated without rifampin.
本研究旨在评估利福平治疗清创保留(D/R)治疗金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)或凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌(CNS)假体关节感染(PJI)的疗效和安全性。我们计算了 101 例 SA 或 CNS PJI 患者接受 D/R 和抗菌治疗的治疗失败累积发生率(TF)。评估了利福平方案的使用效果。Cox 比例风险回归评估了治疗与 TF 之间的关联,同时控制了使用利福平的倾向性和时间上的混杂因素。前瞻性利福平治疗的患者中,有 7%(1/14)发生了 TF,而历史上利福平治疗的患者中,有 32%(10/31)发生了 TF,历史上未用利福平治疗的患者中,有 38%(21/56)发生了 TF。在控制了使用利福平的倾向性和美国麻醉医师协会评分后,与未用利福平治疗的历史队列相比,前瞻性队列中的患者 TF 风险较低(HR 0.11;95%CI 0.01-0.84)。前瞻性研究中没有患者发生肝毒性(0/14)。与未用利福平治疗的历史队列相比,D/R 和利福平方案治疗的葡萄球菌 PJI 结局更好。