Suppr超能文献

SULT1A1 密码子 213 多态性与乳腺癌易感性的关联:涉及 23445 名受试者的 16 项研究的荟萃分析。

The association of SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: meta-analysis from 16 studies involving 23,445 subjects.

机构信息

Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610083, China.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jan;125(1):215-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-0953-5. Epub 2010 May 27.

Abstract

Epidemiological studies on the association between SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. In order to derive a more precise estimation of the association, a meta-analysis was conducted in this article. Sixteen studies including 9,881 cases and 13,564 controls were collected for SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism by searching the databases of Medline, PubMed, Embase, and ISI Web of Knowledge. The strength of association between SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility was assessed by calculating crude ORs with 95% CIs. When all the 21 studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, there was no evidence for significant association between SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility (for Arg/Arg versus Arg/His: OR = 0.999, 95% CI = 0.941-1.061; for Arg/Arg versus His/His: OR = 1.121, 95% CI = 1.013-1.242; for dominant model: OR = 1.128, 95% CI = 1.01-1.26; for recessive model: OR = 1.151, 95% CI = 0.950-1.394). In the subgroup analysis by the source of controls, significant increased risk was found for hospital-based studies (for Arg/Arg versus Arg/His: OR = 1.173, 95% CI = 1.000-1.376; for Arg/Arg versus His/His: OR = 1.600, 95% CI = 1.134-2.256; for dominant model: OR = 1.269, 95% CI = 1.134-2.256; for recessive model: OR = 1.664, 95% CI = 1.070-2.588). In summary, the meta-analysis suggests that SULT1A1 codon 213 polymorphism may be associated with the hospital-based studies. However, large number of samples and representative hospital-based studies with homogeneous breast cancer patients and well-matched controls are warranted to confirm this finding.

摘要

关于 SULT1A1 密码子 213 多态性与乳腺癌风险之间的关联的流行病学研究尚无定论。为了更准确地评估这种关联,本文进行了荟萃分析。通过检索 Medline、PubMed、Embase 和 ISI Web of Knowledge 数据库,共收集了 16 项研究,包括 9881 例病例和 13564 例对照,用于 SULT1A1 密码子 213 多态性。通过计算粗比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)来评估 SULT1A1 密码子 213 多态性与乳腺癌易感性之间的关联强度。当将所有 21 项研究合并到荟萃分析中时,SULT1A1 密码子 213 多态性与乳腺癌易感性之间没有显著关联的证据(对于 Arg/Arg 与 Arg/His:OR=0.999,95%CI=0.941-1.061;对于 Arg/Arg 与 His/His:OR=1.121,95%CI=1.013-1.242;对于显性模型:OR=1.128,95%CI=1.01-1.26;对于隐性模型:OR=1.151,95%CI=0.950-1.394)。在按对照来源进行的亚组分析中,发现基于医院的研究存在显著的风险增加(对于 Arg/Arg 与 Arg/His:OR=1.173,95%CI=1.000-1.376;对于 Arg/Arg 与 His/His:OR=1.600,95%CI=1.134-2.256;对于显性模型:OR=1.269,95%CI=1.134-2.256;对于隐性模型:OR=1.664,95%CI=1.070-2.588)。总之,荟萃分析表明 SULT1A1 密码子 213 多态性可能与基于医院的研究有关。然而,需要更多的样本和具有代表性的基于医院的研究,这些研究应包含同质的乳腺癌患者和匹配良好的对照,以证实这一发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验