Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jul;122(2):521-5. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0731-4. Epub 2010 Jan 7.
Published data on the association between cytochrome P-450 1A2 (CYP1A2)-164 A/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk are inconclusive. To derive a more precise estimation of the relationship, a meta-analysis was performed. Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched. Crude ORs with 95% CIs were used to assess the strength of association between CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and breast cancer risk. The pooled ORs were performed for co-dominant model (AC versus AA, CC versus AA), dominant model (CC + AC versus AA), and recessive model (CC versus AA + AC), respectively. A total of 9 studies including 7,580 cases and 10,020 controls were involved in this meta-analysis. Overall, no significantly elevated breast cancer risk was found in all genetic models when all studies were pooled into the meta-analysis (AC versus AA: OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.92-1.13; CC versus AA: OR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.83-1.64; dominant model: OR = 1.07, 95% CI = 0.93-1.23; and recessive model: OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.82-1.55). In the subgroup analysis by ethnicity or source of controls, there was still no significant association detected in all genetic models. In conclusion, upto date, there is still not enough evidence to indicate the association of CYP1A2-164 A/C polymorphism and breast cancer development.
关于细胞色素 P-450 1A2(CYP1A2)-164 A/C 多态性与乳腺癌风险之间的关联,已有发表的数据尚无定论。为了得出更精确的评估结果,进行了荟萃分析。检索了 Medline、PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science。使用粗 OR 和 95%CI 来评估 CYP1A2-164 A/C 多态性与乳腺癌风险之间的关联强度。分别对共显性模型(AC 与 AA、CC 与 AA)、显性模型(CC+AC 与 AA)和隐性模型(CC 与 AA+AC)进行了合并 OR 分析。这项荟萃分析共纳入了 9 项研究,包括 7580 例病例和 10020 例对照。总体而言,当所有研究都纳入荟萃分析时,所有遗传模型均未发现乳腺癌风险显著升高(AC 与 AA:OR=1.02,95%CI=0.92-1.13;CC 与 AA:OR=1.17,95%CI=0.83-1.64;显性模型:OR=1.07,95%CI=0.93-1.23;隐性模型:OR=1.13,95%CI=0.82-1.55)。按种族或对照来源进行亚组分析时,所有遗传模型仍未发现显著关联。综上所述,目前尚无足够证据表明 CYP1A2-164 A/C 多态性与乳腺癌发生之间存在关联。