Küchler Erika Calvano, da Motta Luise Gomes, Vieira Alexandre Rezende, Granjeiro José Mauro
Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011 Jan;48(1):103-8. doi: 10.1597/09-159. Epub 2010 Apr 19.
The aim of this work was to investigate in more detail the dental clinical features that could serve to define subphenotypes of oral clefts.
Dental records of oral cleft subjects from a group of 164 cases were examined, and 157 were included in this study. In addition, 65 families with two or more siblings born with clefts and 30 control families were evaluated to determine whether dental phenotypes were sporadic. Type of oral cleft and dental phenotypes (tooth agenesis, supernumerary teeth, taurodontism, dental transposition, and microdontia) outside the cleft area were investigated. Association of dental anomalies with preferential subtypes of cleft (subphenotype) was assessed.
A total of 74 subjects presented at least one developmental dental anomaly. Tooth agenesis was the most common dental anomaly (28.6%), followed by taurodontism (15.2%). Supernumerary teeth were associated with cleft palate only (p = .05). The absence of maxillary left lateral incisors was significantly associated with unilateral right cleft lip (p = .02). Bilateral clefts were strongly associated with bilateral dental anomalies (p < 0.001). In the cleft lip and palate group, tooth agenesis was associated with dental transposition (p = .03) and with supernumerary teeth (p = .009). Subjects with oral clefts have a higher risk of tooth agenesis (odds ratio = 3.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 10.13) and taurodontism (odds ratio = 3.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.28 to 6.82). Tooth agenesis, microdontic upper lateral incisors, and supernumerary teeth were most commonly found in unaffected siblings and parents of children born with clefts in comparison with families with no family history of clefts (p = .01).
The preferential associations between specific cleft types with dental phenotypes suggest dental anomalies can be used as clinical markers to define the subphenotype isolated cleft lip and palate.
本研究旨在更详细地调查可用于定义口腔裂隙亚表型的牙齿临床特征。
检查了一组164例口腔裂隙患者的牙科记录,本研究纳入了其中157例。此外,对65个有两个或更多患裂隙同胞的家庭和30个对照家庭进行评估,以确定牙齿表型是否为散发性。研究了口腔裂隙类型以及裂隙区域外的牙齿表型(牙齿缺失、多生牙、牛牙症、牙齿易位和过小牙)。评估了牙齿异常与裂隙优先亚型(亚表型)之间的关联。
共有74名受试者出现至少一种发育性牙齿异常。牙齿缺失是最常见的牙齿异常(28.6%),其次是牛牙症(15.2%)。多生牙仅与腭裂相关(p = 0.05)。上颌左侧侧切牙缺失与右侧单侧唇裂显著相关(p = 0.02)。双侧裂隙与双侧牙齿异常密切相关(p < 0.001)。在唇腭裂组中,牙齿缺失与牙齿易位相关(p = 0.03)以及与多生牙相关(p = 0.009)。口腔裂隙患者发生牙齿缺失(优势比 = 3.33;95%置信区间,1.18至10.13)和牛牙症(优势比 = 3.95;95%置信区间,2.28至6.82)的风险更高。与无裂隙家族史的家庭相比,牙齿缺失、过小的上颌侧切牙和多生牙在患裂隙儿童的未受影响的同胞和父母中最为常见(p = 0.01)。
特定裂隙类型与牙齿表型之间的优先关联表明,牙齿异常可作为临床标志物来定义孤立性唇腭裂的亚表型。