Division of Physical Therapy, Health Sciences Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Jun;91(6):885-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.01.021.
To examine the number of trials needed to achieve performance stability of the Timed Up & Go (TUG) test using a standardized walking aid in patients with hip fracture who are allowed full weight bearing (FWB).
Prospective methodologic study.
An acute 14-bed orthopedic hip fracture unit.
Patients (N=122; 89 women, 33 men) with hip fracture with a median age (25%-75%, quartiles) of 80 (67-85) years performed the TUG on hospital discharge to their own home (n=115) or further inpatient rehabilitation (n=7).
Not applicable.
After a demonstration by a physical therapist how to perform the TUG with a standardized walking aid (a 4-wheeled rollator), the patients performed 6 timed TUG trials with up to 1-minute seated rest intervals. The participants were given a few minutes to familiarize with the rollator before commencing the timed trials. Repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni corrections were used to examine the number of trials needed to ensure statistically stable TUG scores.
A total of 106 (87%) patients performed all 6 TUG trials, while 120 patients performed a minimum of 3 timed trials. Repeated-measures ANOVAs of both groups showed that TUG scores improved significantly (P< or =.007) up to and including the third TUG trial.
These results suggest that the original TUG manual, described as 1 practice trial followed by 1 timed trial, needs modification when used in patients with hip fracture who are allowed FWB. The best (fastest) of 3 timed TUG trials performed with a standardized walking aid is recommended.
使用标准化助行器检查允许完全负重(FWB)的髋部骨折患者达到定时起身行走测试(TUG)性能稳定所需的试验次数。
前瞻性方法学研究。
急性 14 床骨科髋部骨折病房。
122 名髋部骨折患者(89 名女性,33 名男性),中位年龄(25%-75%,四分位数)为 80(67-85)岁,在出院返回家中(n=115)或进一步住院康复(n=7)时进行 TUG。
不适用。
在物理治疗师演示如何使用标准化助行器(四轮助行器)进行 TUG 后,患者进行了 6 次计时 TUG 试验,期间有最多 1 分钟的坐姿休息间隔。在开始计时试验之前,患者有几分钟时间熟悉助行器。使用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和 Bonferroni 校正来检查需要多少次试验以确保 TUG 得分具有统计学稳定性。
共有 106 名(87%)患者完成了所有 6 次 TUG 试验,而 120 名患者完成了至少 3 次计时试验。两组的重复测量 ANOVA 均显示,TUG 评分在第三次 TUG 试验之前显著提高(P<0.007)。
这些结果表明,当用于允许 FWB 的髋部骨折患者时,需要对 TUG 原始手册进行修改,该手册描述为进行 1 次练习试验,然后进行 1 次计时试验。建议使用标准化助行器进行 3 次计时 TUG 试验中的最佳(最快)试验。