Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd., L586, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Jun;19(6):815-22. doi: 10.1007/s00520-010-0905-y. Epub 2010 May 29.
In order to be practically useful, computer applications for patients with cancer must be easily usable by people with limited computer literacy and impaired vision or dexterity. We describe the usability development process for an application that collects quality of life and symptom information from patients with cancer.
Usability testing consisted of user testing with cancer patients to identify initial design problems and a survey to compare the computer application's ease of use between elderly and younger patients.
In user-testing phase, seven men aged 56 to 77 with prostate cancer were observed using the application and interviewed afterwards identifying several usability concerns. Sixty patients with breast, gastrointestinal, or prostate cancer participated in the ease of use survey, with 40% (n=24) aged 65 or older. Younger patients reported significantly higher scores than elderly patients (14.0 vs. 10.8, p = .001), even when prior computer and touch screen use was controlled.
Elderly users reported lower ease of use scores than younger users; however, their average rating was quite high-10.8 on a scale of -16 to +16. It may be unrealistic to expect elderly or less computer literate users to rate any application as positively as younger, more computer savvy users-perhaps it is enough that they rate the application positively and can use it without undue difficulties. We hope that our process can serve as a model for how to bridge the fields of computer usability and healthcare.
为了实用,供癌症患者使用的计算机应用程序必须易于文化程度有限、视力或手眼协调性受损的人使用。我们描述了一种收集癌症患者生活质量和症状信息的应用程序的可用性开发过程。
可用性测试包括对癌症患者进行用户测试,以确定初始设计问题,并进行一项调查,以比较老年和年轻患者对计算机应用程序易用性的看法。
在用户测试阶段,观察了 7 名年龄在 56 岁至 77 岁之间的前列腺癌男性患者使用该应用程序,并在使用后进行了访谈,发现了一些可用性问题。共有 60 名患有乳腺癌、胃肠道癌或前列腺癌的患者参加了易用性调查,其中 40%(n=24)年龄在 65 岁或以上。年轻患者的评分明显高于老年患者(14.0 比 10.8,p=0.001),即使控制了他们之前使用计算机和触摸屏的情况。
老年用户报告的易用性评分低于年轻用户;然而,他们的平均评分相当高-在-16 到+16 的范围内得分为 10.8。期望老年或计算机使用能力较低的用户对任何应用程序的评价与年轻、计算机能力更强的用户一样积极,这可能不太现实-也许他们对应用程序的评价是积极的,并且可以毫不费力地使用它就足够了。我们希望我们的流程可以作为将计算机可用性和医疗保健领域联系起来的模型。