Department of Anesthesiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Jun;63(6):1502-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22339.
The hypothesis that the arterial input function (AIF) of gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid injected by intravenous bolus and measured by the change in the T(1)-relaxation rate (Delta R(1); R(1) = 1/T(1)) of superior sagittal sinus blood (AIF-I) approximates the AIF of (14)C-labeled gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid measured in arterial blood (reference AIF) was tested in a rat stroke model (n = 13). Contrary to the hypothesis, the initial part of the Delta R(1)-time curve was underestimated, and the area under the normalized curve for AIF-I was about 15% lower than that for the reference AIF. Hypothetical AIFs for gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid were derived from the reference AIF values and averaged to obtain a cohort-averaged AIF. Influx rate constants (K(i)) and proton distribution volumes at zero time (V(p) + V(o)) were estimated with Patlak plots of AIF-I, hypothetical AIFs, and cohort-averaged AIFs and tissue Delta R(1) data. For the regions of interest, the K(i)s estimated with AIF-I were slightly but not significantly higher than those obtained with hypothetical AIFs and cohort-averaged AIF. In contrast, V(p) + V(o) was significantly higher when calculated with AIF-I. Similar estimates of K(i) and V(p) + V(o) were obtained with hypothetical AIFs and cohort-averaged AIF. In summary, AIF-I underestimated the reference AIF; this shortcoming had little effect on the K(i) calculated by Patlak plot but produced a significant overestimation of V(p) + V(o).
假设静脉推注顺磁对比剂后,通过测量上矢状窦血 T1 弛豫率(ΔR1;R1=1/T1)变化得到的顺磁对比剂动脉输入函数(AIF)(AIF-I),与放射性核素标记的顺磁对比剂(参考 AIF)在动脉血中的 AIF 近似,该假设在大鼠卒中模型中得到了检验(n=13)。与假设相反,ΔR1-时间曲线的初始部分被低估,AIF-I 的归一化曲线下面积比参考 AIF 低约 15%。基于参考 AIF 值,推导出了顺磁对比剂的假设 AIF,并进行平均,以获得队列平均 AIF。利用 AIF-I、假设 AIF 和队列平均 AIF 及组织 ΔR1 数据,通过 Patlak 图估计流入率常数(K(i))和零时间质子分布容积(V(p)+V(o))。对于感兴趣的区域,AIF-I 计算的 K(i)略高于但无统计学意义高于假设 AIF 和队列平均 AIF 获得的 K(i)。相反,当用 AIF-I 计算时,V(p)+V(o)显著更高。假设 AIF 和队列平均 AIF 得到了相似的 K(i)和 V(p)+V(o)估计值。总之,AIF-I 低估了参考 AIF;这一缺陷对 Patlak 图计算的 K(i)影响较小,但会导致 V(p)+V(o)的显著高估。