Suppr超能文献

皮下缝合用普理灵还是聚对二氧环己酮?

Subcuticular Prolene or PDS for skin closure?

作者信息

Vipond M N, Higgins A F

机构信息

Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Huntingdon, UK.

出版信息

J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1991 Apr;36(2):97-9.

PMID:2051429
Abstract

One hundred patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly allocated to have their skin wound closed by either polypropylene (Prolene) or polydioxanone (PDS) by the subcuticular method. Ninety-one patients completed the study and were assessed at discharge and again 3 months later for wound complications and cosmetic result. No statistically significant differences were found between the two sutures; overall wound infection rate was 5.5% and cosmetic result was equally acceptable for the two suture materials. This study indicates that an absorbable subcuticular suture may be safely used in all classes of wound.

摘要

100例行腹部手术的患者被随机分配,采用皮下缝合法,分别用聚丙烯(普理灵)或聚二氧六环酮(PDS)缝合皮肤切口。91例患者完成了研究,并在出院时以及3个月后再次接受评估,以检查伤口并发症和美观效果。两种缝线之间未发现统计学上的显著差异;总体伤口感染率为5.5%,两种缝线材料的美观效果同样令人满意。本研究表明,可吸收皮下缝线可安全用于各类伤口。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验