• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Our experience with free hand camera].

作者信息

Zonca P, Brenig F, Henkel J, Jacobi C A

机构信息

Zentrum für Viszeral und Minimal Invasive Chirurgie, Wesseling, Koln am Rhein, Nemecko, Chefarzt.

出版信息

Rozhl Chir. 2010 Mar;89(3):188-93.

PMID:20514915
Abstract

AIM

The evaluation of the contribution of Free Hand camera to laparoscopic resection of colon sigmoideum in clinical praxis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Free Hand camera is an automatic camera system controlled by a surgeon. In the prospective-retrospective trial we have compared two groups of 20 patients together. In the first group there were patients with laparoscopic resection of colon sigmoideum with the Free hand camera usage and in the second group there were patients with laparoscopic resection of colon sigmoideum with a human assistant. We evaluated the length of surgery and surgeon's comfort. The intraoperative data of both of the patient groups were compared with the usage of physiological and operative score (POSSUM).

RESULTS

The length of surgery in the group with the human assistant and Free Hand camera were 149, and 161 minutes respectively. There is no statistically significant difference in the length of surgery (p = 0.05) in both of the groups. The surgeon in both of the patient groups evaluated the operative view and comfort as good.

CONCLUSION

The pilot study has shown the usability of Free Hand in praxis. The daily usage of Free Hand camera is possible in elective as well as acute surgeries after managing of the learning curve.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Our experience with free hand camera].
Rozhl Chir. 2010 Mar;89(3):188-93.
2
Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.两种机器人摄像臂EndoAssist和AESOP在腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术中的手术性能比较:一项初步研究。
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):70-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.02.003.
3
Laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis.腹腔镜与手辅助腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Apr;49(4):464-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0500-y.
4
The EndoAssist robotic camera holder as an aid to the introduction of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.EndoAssist机器人摄像头固定器辅助腹腔镜结直肠手术的开展。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2009 Jul;91(5):389-93. doi: 10.1308/003588409X392162. Epub 2009 Apr 30.
5
Efficacy of novel robotic camera vs a standard laparoscopic camera.新型机器人摄像头与标准腹腔镜摄像头的疗效比较。
Surg Innov. 2005 Dec;12(4):315-8. doi: 10.1177/155335060501200405.
6
Evaluation of active camera control systems in gynecological surgery: construction, handling, comfort, surgeries and results.妇科手术中主动式摄像控制系统的评估:构造、操作、舒适性、手术及结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):341-8. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3004-8.
7
What is the optimal time of surgical intervention after an acute attack of sigmoid diverticulitis: early or late elective laparoscopic resection?乙状结肠憩室炎急性发作后手术干预的最佳时间是什么时候:早期还是晚期选择性腹腔镜切除术?
Dis Colon Rectum. 2006 Dec;49(12):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0730-z.
8
The Sigma-trial protocol: a prospective double-blind multi-centre comparison of laparoscopic versus open elective sigmoid resection in patients with symptomatic diverticulitis.西格玛试验方案:有症状憩室炎患者腹腔镜与开放选择性乙状结肠切除术的前瞻性双盲多中心比较
BMC Surg. 2007 Aug 3;7:16. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-7-16.
9
Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control.机器人与人工腹腔镜摄像控制下的外科医生工作量及动作效率
Surg Endosc. 2002 Nov;16(11):1523-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-8272-x. Epub 2002 Jul 8.
10
Early learning effect of residents for laparoscopic sigmoid resection.住院医师腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术的早期学习效果。
J Surg Educ. 2013 Mar-Apr;70(2):200-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.10.004.