• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可重复使用和一次性塑料麻醉药盘的财务成本与环境成本。

The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays.

作者信息

McGain F, McAlister S, McGavin A, Story D

机构信息

Department ofAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, Western Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):538-44. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800320.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X1003800320
PMID:20514965
Abstract

We modelled the financial and environmental costs of two commonly used anaesthetic plastic drug trays. We proposed that, compared with single-use trays, reusable trays are less expensive, consume less water and produce less carbon dioxide, and that routinely adding cotton and paper increases financial and environmental costs. We used life cycle assessment to model the financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use trays. From our life cycle assessment modelling, the reusable tray cost (Australian dollars) $0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] $0.21 to $0.25) while the single-use tray alone cost $0.47 (price range of $0.42 to $0.52) and the single-use tray with cotton and gauze added was $0.90 (no price range in Melbourne). Production of CO2 was 110 g CO2 (95% CI 98 to 122 g CO2) for the reusable tray, 126 g (95% CI 104 to 151 g) for single-use trays alone (mean difference of 16 g, 95% CI -8 to 40 g) and 204 g CO2 (95% CI 166 to 268 g CO2) for the single-use trays with cotton and paper Water use was 3.1 l (95% CI 2.5 to 3.7 l) for the reusable tray, 10.4 l (95% CI 8.2 to 12.7 l) for the single-use tray and 26.7 l (95% CI 20.5 to 35.4 l) for the single-use tray with cotton and paper Compared with reusable plastic trays, single-use trays alone cost twice as much, produced 15% more CO2 and consumed three times the amount of water Packaging cotton gauze and paper with single-use trays markedly increased the financial, energy and water costs. On both financial and environmental grounds it appears difficult to justify the use of single-use drug trays.

摘要

我们对两种常用麻醉塑料药品托盘的财务成本和环境成本进行了建模。我们提出,与一次性托盘相比,可重复使用托盘成本更低,耗水量更少,产生的二氧化碳也更少,并且常规添加棉花和纸张会增加财务成本和环境成本。我们使用生命周期评估对可重复使用托盘和一次性托盘的财务成本和环境成本进行建模。从我们的生命周期评估模型来看,可重复使用托盘成本(澳元)为0.23(95%置信区间[CI]为0.21至0.25),而仅一次性托盘成本为0.47(价格范围为0.42至0.52),添加棉花和纱布的一次性托盘为0.90(墨尔本无价格范围)。可重复使用托盘的二氧化碳产量为110克二氧化碳(95%CI为98至122克二氧化碳),仅一次性托盘为126克(95%CI为104至151克)(平均差异为16克,95%CI为-8至40克),添加棉花和纸张的一次性托盘为204克二氧化碳(95%CI为166至268克二氧化碳)。可重复使用托盘的用水量为3.1升(95%CI为2.5至3.7升),一次性托盘为10.4升(95%CI为8.2至12.7升),添加棉花和纸张的一次性托盘为26.7升(95%CI为20.5至35.4升)。与可重复使用塑料托盘相比,仅一次性托盘成本高出两倍,二氧化碳产量多15%,用水量多两倍。用一次性托盘包装棉花纱布和纸张显著增加了财务、能源和水成本。从财务和环境两方面来看,使用一次性药品托盘似乎很难说得过去。

相似文献

1
The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays.可重复使用和一次性塑料麻醉药盘的财务成本与环境成本。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2010 May;38(3):538-44. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1003800320.
2
A life cycle assessment of reusable and single-use central venous catheter insertion kits.一种可重复使用和一次性使用的中心静脉导管插入套件的生命周期评估。
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1073-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824e9b69. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
3
Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment.可重复使用和一次性麻醉设备的财务和环境成本。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Jun 1;118(6):862-869. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex098.
4
Life Cycle Assessment and Costing Methods for Device Procurement: Comparing Reusable and Single-Use Disposable Laryngoscopes.医疗器械采购的生命周期评估和成本核算方法:比较可重复使用和一次性使用的喉镜
Anesth Analg. 2018 Aug;127(2):434-443. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002683.
5
Carbon Footprint in Flexible Ureteroscopy: A Comparative Study on the Environmental Impact of Reusable and Single-Use Ureteroscopes.软性输尿管镜检查中的碳足迹:可重复使用和一次性使用输尿管镜对环境影响的比较研究。
J Endourol. 2018 Mar;32(3):214-217. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0001. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Single-use synthetic plastic and natural fibre anaesthetic drug trays: a comparative life cycle assessment of environmental impacts.一次性使用的合成塑料和天然纤维麻醉药物托盘:环境影响的比较生命周期评估。
Br J Anaesth. 2024 Dec;133(6):1465-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.05.031. Epub 2024 Jul 12.
7
Comparative life cycle assessment of disposable and reusable laryngeal mask airways.一次性与可重复使用的喉罩气道的生命周期比较评估。
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1067-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824f6959. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
8
Does reusable mean green? Comparison of the environmental impact of reusable operating room bed covers and lift sheets versus single-use.可重复使用是否意味着环保?可重复使用的手术室床罩和升降单与一次性产品的环境影响比较。
Surgeon. 2024 Aug;22(4):236-241. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
9
[Prioritized utilisation and reprocessing of reusable equipment in anaesthesiology deparmtents : Recommendations on how to reduce CO emissions from anaesthetic equipment].[麻醉科可重复使用设备的优先使用与再处理:关于如何减少麻醉设备碳排放的建议]
Anaesthesiologie. 2023 Jun;72(6):433-444. doi: 10.1007/s00101-023-01268-2. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
10
Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.腹腔镜胆囊切除术使用的一次性器械和可重复使用器械的经济与环境影响比较。
Surg Endosc. 2005 Feb;19(2):268-72. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9232-4. Epub 2004 Dec 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Healthcare Costs and Carbon Emissions of Stage III Melanoma Surveillance Imaging.III期黑色素瘤监测成像的医疗成本和碳排放
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2025 Aug 30. doi: 10.1007/s40258-025-00998-1.
2
Assessing the carbon footprint of the initial 24 h post-severe trauma admission in a French ICU: a pilot study.评估法国重症监护病房严重创伤入院后最初24小时的碳足迹:一项试点研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2025 Aug 11;15(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13613-025-01536-x.
3
Climate change and environmental sustainability in emergency medicine: a narrative review.
急诊医学中的气候变化与环境可持续性:一项叙述性综述
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Jun 27;13(3):31. doi: 10.21037/atm-25-57. Epub 2025 Jun 24.
4
Challenges in achieving more sustainable anaesthesia practices: a narrative review of waste reduction.实现更可持续麻醉实践的挑战:减少浪费的叙述性综述
BJA Open. 2025 Apr 22;14:100406. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2025.100406. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Comment on: "The environmental impact of multi‑specialty robotic‑assisted surgery: a waste audit analysis".关于《多专科机器人辅助手术的环境影响:废物审计分析》的评论
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 7;19(1):137. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02306-4.
6
The environmental impact of multi-specialty robotic-assisted surgery: a waste audit analysis.多专科机器人辅助手术的环境影响:一项废物审计分析
J Robot Surg. 2025 Mar 11;19(1):113. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02278-5.
7
Environmental sustainability in cardiovascular practice: current challenges and future directions.心血管医学实践中的环境可持续性:当前挑战与未来方向
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Apr;22(4):241-254. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01077-z. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
8
Instilling a culture of cleaning: Effectiveness of decontamination practices on non-disposable sphygmomanometer cuffs.灌输清洁文化:去污措施对非一次性血压计袖带的有效性。
J Infect Prev. 2018 Nov;19(6):294-299. doi: 10.1177/1757177418780997. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Go Green in Neuroradiology: towards reducing the environmental impact of its practice.神经放射学中的绿色行动:减少实践活动的环境影响。
Neuroradiology. 2024 Apr;66(4):463-476. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03305-2. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
10
Sustainable Purchasing Practices: A Comparison of Single-use and Reusable Pulse Oximeters in the Emergency Department.可持续采购实践:急诊部门中单用和复用脉搏血氧计的比较。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Nov;24(6):1034-1042. doi: 10.5811/westjem.58258.