Scherf Uwe, Becker Robert, Chan Maria, Hojvat Sally
Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety, Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 2010;242:96-102. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2010.493415.
FDA has been regulating diagnostic tests (including biomarkers) since passage of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976. Although always of interest as diagnostic tools, biomarkers (particularly genetic/genomic) have become of increased interest because of their potential impact on the development and personalized use of drugs. Unfortunately, there seem to be uncertainties among translational researchers as to the specific analytical and clinical measurement criteria needed for the approval of these novel biomarkers. This meeting presentation describes the current FDA perspective and major requirements and data for the validation/approval of an in vitro diagnostic device (IVD) based on a biomarker. The approval process for an IVD based on a biomarker used in the identification of a disease or condition (diagnosing, screening, monitoring) is well established, and is essentially identical to the process to generate sufficient analytical and clinical data for the approval of regular diagnostic devices. On the contrary, approvals for IVDs based on biomarker which may be designed to evaluate the efficacy or answer safety questions for new drug entities are less streamlined. The clinical studies are more complex, resulting in higher ethical standards, increased costs and requiring complex statistical evaluation. There is a small but growing literature on new models for co-development of drugs and diagnostics which will be discussed. Regulators like the FDA develop and bring a flexible regulatory toolbox to the table and are committed to assuring that scientific and regulatory thresholds are tempered to assure rapid access to new technologies while protecting public health.
自1976年《医疗器械修正案》通过以来,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)一直在监管诊断测试(包括生物标志物)。尽管生物标志物作为诊断工具一直备受关注,但由于它们对药物开发和个性化使用的潜在影响,其(尤其是基因/基因组生物标志物)受到的关注日益增加。不幸的是,转化研究人员对于这些新型生物标志物获批所需的具体分析和临床测量标准似乎存在不确定性。本次会议报告介绍了FDA目前对于基于生物标志物的体外诊断设备(IVD)验证/获批的观点、主要要求及数据。基于用于识别疾病或病症(诊断、筛查、监测)的生物标志物的IVD的获批流程已很成熟,且基本上与为常规诊断设备获批生成足够分析和临床数据的流程相同。相反,基于可能旨在评估新药实体疗效或回答安全性问题的生物标志物的IVD的获批流程则不那么顺畅。临床研究更为复杂,导致道德标准更高、成本增加且需要复杂的统计评估。关于药物和诊断共同开发的新模型的文献虽少但在不断增加,将对此进行讨论。像FDA这样的监管机构开发并带来了一个灵活的监管工具箱,并致力于确保科学和监管门槛得到调整,以确保在保护公众健康的同时能快速获取新技术。