• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用累积离差法进行柏林考试中的跨机构基准测试。

Using the cumulative deviation method for cross-institutional benchmarking in the Berlin progress test.

机构信息

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2010;32(6):471-5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485653.

DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2010.485653
PMID:20515375
Abstract

The Berlin Progress Test has grown to a cooperation of 13 universities. Recently, comparisons between the participating schools became an area of high interest. Muijtjens et al. [Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, Thoben AJNM, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008a. Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test. Med Educ 41(1):82-88; Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008b. Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data. Adv Health Sci Educ 13:593-605] proposed a method for cross-institutional benchmarking based on progress test data. Progress testing has some major advantages as it delivers longitudinal information about student's growth of knowledge. By adopting the procedure of Muijtjens et al. ( 2008a , b), we were able to replicate the basic characteristics of the cumulative deviation method. Besides the advantages of the method, there are some difficulties as errors of measurement are not independent, which violates the premises of testing statistical differences.

摘要

柏林进展测试已经发展成为 13 所大学的合作项目。最近,参与学校之间的比较成为了一个非常关注的领域。Muijtjens 等人[Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, Thoben AJNM, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008a. 通过跨机构比较进展测试中学生成绩进行基准测试。医学教育 41(1):82-88; Muijtjens AM, Schuwirth LWT, Cohen-Schotanus J, van der Vleuten CPM. 2008b. 多课程进展测试数据揭示的知识发展差异。Adv Health Sci Educ 13:593-605]提出了一种基于进展测试数据的跨机构基准测试方法。进展测试具有一些主要优势,因为它提供了关于学生知识增长的纵向信息。通过采用 Muijtjens 等人(2008a,b)的程序,我们能够复制累积偏差方法的基本特征。除了该方法的优势外,还存在一些困难,因为测量误差不是独立的,这违反了测试统计差异的前提。

相似文献

1
Using the cumulative deviation method for cross-institutional benchmarking in the Berlin progress test.使用累积离差法进行柏林考试中的跨机构基准测试。
Med Teach. 2010;32(6):471-5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485653.
2
Benchmarking by cross-institutional comparison of student achievement in a progress test.通过对进步测试中学生成绩的跨机构比较进行基准测试。
Med Educ. 2008 Jan;42(1):82-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02896.x.
3
Differences in knowledge development exposed by multi-curricular progress test data.多课程进展测试数据揭示的知识发展差异。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2008 Dec;13(5):593-605. doi: 10.1007/s10459-007-9066-2. Epub 2007 May 4.
4
The versatility of progress testing assessed in an international context: a start for benchmarking global standardization?在国际背景下评估的进展测试的多功能性:迈向全球标准化基准的开端?
Med Teach. 2005 Sep;27(6):514-20. doi: 10.1080/01421590500136238.
5
Progress testing in German speaking countries.德语国家的进展测试。
Med Teach. 2010;32(6):467-70. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.485656.
6
Standard setting for progress tests: combining external and internal standards.进展测试的标准制定:结合外部标准和内部标准。
Med Educ. 2009 Jun;43(6):589-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03372.x.
7
Cross institutional collaboration in assessment: a case on progress testing.评估中的跨机构合作:以进展测试为例
Med Teach. 2004 Dec;26(8):719-25. doi: 10.1080/01421590400016464.
8
Can computer-based assessment enhance the acceptance of formative multiple choice exams? A utility analysis.基于计算机的评估能否提高形成性多项选择题考试的接受度?一种效用分析。
Med Teach. 2012;34(4):292-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.652707. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
9
Flexible electronic feedback using the virtues of progress testing.利用进步测试的优点实现灵活的电子反馈。
Med Teach. 2010;32(6):491-5. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.486058.
10
Progress testing in resource-poor countries: a case from Mozambique.资源匮乏国家的进展性测试:来自莫桑比克的案例。
Med Teach. 2010;32(6):461-3. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.486059.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges to acquire similar learning outcomes across four parallel thematic learning communities in a medical undergraduate curriculum.在医学本科课程中,四个平行的主题学习社区中获取类似学习成果的挑战。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 May 18;23(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04341-x.
2
Exploring pooled analysis of pretested items to monitor the performance of medical students exposed to different curriculum designs.探讨针对不同课程设计的医学生进行预测试项目的汇总分析,以监测其表现。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 10;16(9):e0257293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257293. eCollection 2021.
3
Using longitudinal progress test data to determine the effect size of learning in undergraduate medical education - a retrospective, single-center, mixed model analysis of progress testing results.
利用纵向进展测试数据来确定本科医学教育中的学习效果大小——对进展测试结果的回顾性、单中心、混合模型分析。
Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26(1):1972505. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1972505.
4
First reported implementation of a German-language progress test in an undergraduate dental curriculum: A prospective study.首次报道在本科牙科课程中实施德语水平测试:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2018 Nov;22(4):e698-e705. doi: 10.1111/eje.12381. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
5
The use of progress testing.使用进展测试。
Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Mar;1(1):24-30. doi: 10.1007/s40037-012-0007-2. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
6
Knowledge assessment of trainees and trainers in general practice in a neighboring country. Making a case for international collaboration.全科医生培训者和受训者知识评估。呼吁开展国际合作。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 15;13:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-103.