• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架置入术后靶病变血运重建:临床表现与结局

Target lesion revascularization after bare-metal or drug-eluting stents: clinical presentations and outcomes.

作者信息

Hayes Kevin R, Applegate Robert J, Sacrinty Matthew T, Kutcher Michael A, Gandhi Sanjay K, Santos Renato M, Little William C

机构信息

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Section of Cardiology, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1045, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Jun;22(6):266-70.

PMID:20516505
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We sought to examine the clinical presentations and subsequent clinical outcomes of patients undergoing target lesion revascularization (TLR) after either bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) placement.

BACKGROUND

The widely held notion that BMS TLR is benign has recently been challenged. While DES substantially reduce TLR, little is known about the clinical syndromes accompanying DES TLR and the long-term clinical outcomes after TLR.

METHODS

The clinical syndrome at the time of hospitalization when TLR was performed and subsequent clinical outcomes after TLR were assessed in 1,147 BMS patients and 1,246 DES patients who were followed for 3 years. Patients were considered to have TLR when repeat target lesion PCI was required including those with myocardial infarction (MI) and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

At 3 years, the overall incidence of TLR was higher after BMS compared to DES 98/1,147 (9.2%) vs. 56/1,246 (4.5%); p < 0.001. The clinical presentations at the time of TLR were not always benign with non-STelevation myocardial infarction (N-STEMI) or STEMI in 25% of BMS vs. 34% DES; p = 0.217. The risk of non-fatal MI or death outcomes over 3 years were significantly worse in those with TLR compared to those without TLR; hazard ratio (HR) 2.65 (2.00-3.52), independent of stent type.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical presentation at the time of TLR is not always a benign clinical event and identifies a subgroup of stent-treated patients at high risk for non-fatal MI or death in the 3 years following the index percutaneous coronary intervention, independent of stent type.

摘要

目的

我们试图研究接受裸金属支架(BMS)或药物洗脱支架(DES)置入术后进行靶病变血管重建术(TLR)的患者的临床表现及随后的临床结局。

背景

BMS TLR是良性的这一广泛持有的观念最近受到了挑战。虽然DES可大幅降低TLR,但对于DES TLR伴随的临床综合征以及TLR后的长期临床结局知之甚少。

方法

对1147例BMS患者和1246例DES患者进行了3年的随访,评估了进行TLR时的住院临床综合征以及TLR后的后续临床结局。当需要重复进行靶病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)时,包括发生心肌梗死(MI)和支架血栓形成的患者,被视为进行了TLR。

结果

3年时,BMS术后TLR的总体发生率高于DES,分别为98/1147(9.2%)和56/1246(4.5%);p<0.001。TLR时的临床表现并不总是良性的,25%的BMS患者和34%的DES患者发生非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(N-STEMI)或ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI);p=0.217。与未进行TLR的患者相比,进行TLR的患者3年内非致命性MI或死亡结局的风险显著更差;风险比(HR)为2.65(2.00-至3.52),与支架类型无关。

结论

TLR时的临床表现并不总是良性临床事件,并且确定了一组在首次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的3年中发生非致命性MI或死亡风险较高的支架治疗患者亚组,与支架类型无关。

相似文献

1
Target lesion revascularization after bare-metal or drug-eluting stents: clinical presentations and outcomes.裸金属支架或药物洗脱支架置入术后靶病变血运重建:临床表现与结局
J Invasive Cardiol. 2010 Jun;22(6):266-70.
2
Long-term clinical outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for treatment of restenosis within bare-metal versus drug-eluting stents.西罗莫司洗脱支架植入治疗裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架内再狭窄后的长期临床结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):594-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21399.
3
Effect of coronary target lesion revascularization on late cardiac events after insertion of sirolimus-eluting or bare metal stents.冠状动脉靶病变血运重建对西罗莫司洗脱支架或金属裸支架置入后晚期心脏事件的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Sep 15;106(6):774-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.04.039. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
4
Clinical outcome after primary percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting and bare metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者行药物洗脱支架和金属裸支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床转归。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Dec;1(3):176-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.794578.
5
Long-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in saphenous vein graft disease: results from the Prairie "Real World" Stent Registry.药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架在静脉桥病变中的长期疗效:Prairie“真实世界”支架注册研究结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Jan 1;75(1):93-100. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22194.
6
Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents.与裸金属支架相比,药物洗脱支架无保护左主干冠状动脉支架置入术的长期安全性和有效性。
Circulation. 2009 Aug 4;120(5):400-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.800805. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
7
Long-term outcome of patients of over 85 years old with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary stenting: a comparison of bare metal stent and drug eluting stent.85岁以上急性冠脉综合征患者接受经皮冠状动脉支架置入术的长期预后:裸金属支架与药物洗脱支架的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 May 20;121(10):887-91.
8
Paclitaxel-eluting versus bare-metal stents in acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)中紫杉醇洗脱支架与裸金属支架的比较
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2008 Dec;7(4):232-8. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181805e0b.
9
Effect of length and diameter of drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents on late outcomes.药物洗脱支架与金属裸支架的长度和直径对晚期结果的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb;2(1):35-42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.805630. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
10
Unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents in routine clinical practice: findings from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry.在常规临床实践中药物洗脱支架与裸金属支架的 unrestricted 使用:来自美国国立心肺血液研究所动态注册研究的结果。(注:这里“unrestricted”翻译为“无限制的”,但感觉表述不太准确,可能原文有特定含义,需结合更多背景理解)
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Nov 20;50(21):2029-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.071.

引用本文的文献

1
In-stent restenosis of drug-eluting stents: clinical presentation and outcomes in a real-world scenario.药物洗脱支架的支架内再狭窄:真实世界中的临床表现与结局
Egypt Heart J. 2019 Nov 27;71(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s43044-019-0025-z.