• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床前中风研究的方法学质量并非在高影响力期刊上发表所必需的。

Methodological quality of preclinical stroke studies is not required for publication in high-impact journals.

作者信息

Minnerup Jens, Wersching Heike, Diederich Kai, Schilling Matthias, Ringelstein Erich Bernd, Wellmann Jürgen, Schäbitz Wolf-Rüdiger

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Sep;30(9):1619-24. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.74. Epub 2010 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1038/jcbfm.2010.74
PMID:20517323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2949256/
Abstract

Omitting quality characteristics in animal stroke studies leads to an overestimation of the efficacy of candidate stroke drugs. Nevertheless, the methodological quality of preclinical stroke studies is often limited. As publishing of research results in high-impact journals is an important motivation for scientists, we analyzed whether study quality predicts high-impact publishing. Animal stroke studies of neuroprotective drugs that were recently investigated in clinical phase II/III trials were included in the analysis. Data on the study quality and other important study characteristics were extracted. Regression analyses were performed to estimate the effect of the study characteristics on the journal's impact factor. We identified 117 studies that investigated 12 different drugs. Study quality was not associated with the impact factor before (beta=-0.2, P=0.50) and after adjustment for other study characteristics (beta=-0.3, P=0.19). There was a significant association of the number of investigated mechanisms and applied techniques with the impact factor (beta=1.4, P<0.0001). Our findings show that the quality of animal experimental stroke studies is not relevant for publishing in high-impact journals. The major predictor for accepting preclinical stroke studies in high-impact journals is the complexity of the investigation into a stroke drug's mode of action.

摘要

在动物中风研究中忽略质量特征会导致对候选中风药物疗效的高估。然而,临床前中风研究的方法学质量往往有限。由于在高影响力期刊上发表研究成果是科学家的一项重要动力,我们分析了研究质量是否能预测高影响力发表。分析纳入了近期在临床II/III期试验中研究的神经保护药物的动物中风研究。提取了关于研究质量和其他重要研究特征的数据。进行回归分析以估计研究特征对期刊影响因子的影响。我们确定了117项研究,这些研究调查了12种不同的药物。在调整其他研究特征之前(β=-0.2,P=0.50)和之后(β=-0.3,P=0.19),研究质量与影响因子均无关联。所研究的机制数量和应用技术与影响因子存在显著关联(β=1.4,P<0.0001)。我们的研究结果表明,动物实验性中风研究的质量与在高影响力期刊上发表无关。高影响力期刊接受临床前中风研究的主要预测因素是对中风药物作用模式研究的复杂性。

相似文献

1
Methodological quality of preclinical stroke studies is not required for publication in high-impact journals.临床前中风研究的方法学质量并非在高影响力期刊上发表所必需的。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2010 Sep;30(9):1619-24. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.74. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
2
Methodological quality of animal studies of neuroprotective agents currently in phase II/III acute ischemic stroke trials.目前处于急性缺血性中风试验II/III期的神经保护剂动物研究的方法学质量。
Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):577-81. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524330. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
3
A Fall From Grace?失宠?
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Jan 13;46(1):9-10. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.9-10.
4
Bibliometric analysis of case report citations and their effect on the impact factor: How does publishing case reports impact journals?案例报告引文的文献计量分析及其对影响因子的影响:发表案例报告如何影响期刊?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020 Dec;106(8):1463-1467. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2020.05.016. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
[Representation of Nursing Scientists from German-speaking countries in High Impact Journals. A bibliometric publication analysis].[德语国家护理科学家在高影响力期刊上的表现。文献计量学出版物分析]
Pflege. 2018 Feb;31(1):31-39. doi: 10.1024/1012-5302/a000593. Epub 2018 Jan 26.
6
Quality Assessment of Studies Published in Open Access and Subscription Journals: Results of a Systematic Evaluation.开放获取期刊和订阅期刊发表研究的质量评估:系统评价结果
PLoS One. 2016 May 11;11(5):e0154217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154217. eCollection 2016.
7
Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.麻醉学文献中的发表偏倚。
Anesth Analg. 2012 May;114(5):1042-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182468fc6. Epub 2012 Feb 17.
8
Validity of the impact factor of journals as a measure of randomized controlled trial quality.期刊影响因子作为衡量随机对照试验质量指标的有效性。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Jan;67(1):37-40. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0106.
9
Beyond the Impact Factor.超越影响因子
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2019 Mar 1;46(2):143-145. doi: 10.1188/19.ONF.143-145.
10
Why Most Acute Stroke Studies Are Positive in Animals but Not in Patients: A Systematic Comparison of Preclinical, Early Phase, and Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Neuroprotective Agents.为什么大多数急性中风动物研究是阳性的,而在患者中却不是:神经保护剂的临床前、早期和 3 期临床试验的系统比较。
Ann Neurol. 2020 Jan;87(1):40-51. doi: 10.1002/ana.25643. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
CRIME-Q-a unifying tool for critical appraisal of methodological (technical) quality, quality of reporting and risk of bias in animal research.CRIME-Q:一种用于批判性评估动物研究中方法学(技术)质量、报告质量和偏倚风险的统一工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02413-0.
2
Do German university medical centres promote robust and transparent research? A cross-sectional study of institutional policies.德国大学医学中心是否促进了稳健透明的研究?一项机构政策的横断面研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 12;20(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00841-2.
3
Quality and validity of large animal experiments in stroke: A systematic review.大型动物实验在中风研究中的质量和有效性:系统评价。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 Nov;40(11):2152-2164. doi: 10.1177/0271678X20931062. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
4
Reporting preclinical anesthesia study (REPEAT): Evaluating the quality of reporting in the preclinical anesthesiology literature.报告临床前麻醉研究(REPEAT):评估临床前麻醉学文献中的报告质量。
PLoS One. 2019 May 23;14(5):e0215221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215221. eCollection 2019.
5
Impact of Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable (STAIR) Guidelines on Peri-Anesthesia Care for Rat Models of Stroke: A Meta-Analysis Comparing the Years 2005 and 2015.中风治疗学术产业圆桌会议(STAIR)指南对中风大鼠模型围麻醉期护理的影响:一项比较2005年和2015年的荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 25;12(1):e0170243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170243. eCollection 2017.
6
The Devil Is in the Details: Incomplete Reporting in Preclinical Animal Research.细节决定成败:临床前动物研究中的报告不完整问题。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):e0166733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166733. eCollection 2016.
7
The Relationship between Risk of Bias Criteria, Research Outcomes, and Study Sponsorship in a Cohort of Preclinical Thiazolidinedione Animal Studies: A Meta-Analysis.一组临床前噻唑烷二酮类动物研究中偏倚风险标准、研究结果与研究资助之间的关系:一项荟萃分析
Evid Based Preclin Med. 2014 Apr;1(1):11-20. doi: 10.1002/ebm2.5.
8
Nonindustry-sponsored preclinical studies on statins yield greater efficacy estimates than industry-sponsored studies: a meta-analysis.非行业赞助的他汀类药物临床前研究比行业赞助的研究产生更大的疗效估计:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001770. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001770. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
9
Some salt with your statin, professor?吃他汀类药物时要不要加点盐,教授?
PLoS Biol. 2014 Jan;12(1):e1001768. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001768. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
10
Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review.评估发表的动物研究偏倚风险和其他方法学标准的工具:系统评价。
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Sep;121(9):985-92. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1206389. Epub 2013 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.动物中风研究报告中的发表偏倚导致疗效的严重夸大。
PLoS Biol. 2010 Mar 30;8(3):e1000344. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000344.
2
The efficacy of erythropoietin and its analogues in animal stroke models: a meta-analysis.促红细胞生成素及其类似物在动物脑卒中模型中的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Stroke. 2009 Sep;40(9):3113-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.555789. Epub 2009 Jun 18.
3
Effects of NXY-059 in experimental stroke: an individual animal meta-analysis.NXY-059 对实验性中风的影响:个体动物荟萃分析。
Br J Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;157(7):1157-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00196.x. Epub 2009 Apr 27.
4
Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations.中风治疗学术产业圆桌会议临床前建议更新
Stroke. 2009 Jun;40(6):2244-50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.541128. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
5
Multifunctional actions of approved and candidate stroke drugs.已批准和候选中风药物的多功能作用。
Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Jan;6(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2008.10.032.
6
Methodological quality of animal studies of neuroprotective agents currently in phase II/III acute ischemic stroke trials.目前处于急性缺血性中风试验II/III期的神经保护剂动物研究的方法学质量。
Stroke. 2009 Feb;40(2):577-81. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.524330. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
7
Reprint: Good laboratory practice: preventing introduction of bias at the bench.转载:良好实验室规范:防止实验台引入偏差。
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2009 Feb;29(2):221-3. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2008.101. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
8
Evidence for the efficacy of NXY-059 in experimental focal cerebral ischaemia is confounded by study quality.NXY - 059在实验性局灶性脑缺血中的疗效证据因研究质量而混淆。
Stroke. 2008 Oct;39(10):2824-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.515957. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
9
Meta-analysis of the efficacy of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in animal models of focal cerebral ischemia.粒细胞集落刺激因子在局灶性脑缺血动物模型中疗效的Meta分析。
Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1855-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.506816. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
10
Empirical evidence of bias in the design of experimental stroke studies: a metaepidemiologic approach.实验性中风研究设计中偏倚的实证证据:一种元流行病学方法。
Stroke. 2008 Mar;39(3):929-34. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.498725. Epub 2008 Jan 31.