Kim Sung-Wan, Yoo Joon-An, Lee Sam-Yeon, Kim Seon-Young, Bae Kyung-Yeol, Yang Su-Jin, Kim Jae-Min, Shin Il-Seon, Yoon Jin-Sang
Department of Psychiatry, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jun-Jul;25(4):298-302. doi: 10.1002/hup.1117.
This study compared the effectiveness of risperidone and olanzapine in the treatment of delirium.
This was a 7-day, randomized, comparative clinical trial of risperidone and olanzapine in patients with delirium. The primary outcome measure was the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98).
We enrolled 32 subjects (median age, 70 years). Significant within-group improvements in the DRS-R-98 scores over time were observed at every time point in both treatment groups; however, differences in the change of the DRS-R-98 score from baseline were not significant between the treatment groups. On the first day after drug treatment, there was a trend toward greater improvement in the DRS-R-98 score in the olanzapine group compared with the risperidone group, but it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.076). The response rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (risperidone group: 64.7%, olanzapine group: 73.3%). However, the response to risperidone was significantly poorer in patients >or=70 years of age compared with those aged <70 years. There was no significant difference in the safety profiles, including extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs), between the two groups.
Risperidone and olanzapine were equally effective in reducing delirium symptoms. The response to risperidone was poorer in the older age group.
本研究比较了利培酮和奥氮平治疗谵妄的有效性。
这是一项为期7天的利培酮和奥氮平治疗谵妄患者的随机对照临床试验。主要结局指标是谵妄评定量表修订版98(DRS-R-98)。
我们纳入了32名受试者(中位年龄70岁)。两个治疗组在每个时间点均观察到DRS-R-98评分随时间的显著组内改善;然而,治疗组间DRS-R-98评分相对于基线的变化差异无统计学意义。在药物治疗后的第一天,奥氮平组的DRS-R-98评分改善趋势大于利培酮组,但未达到统计学意义(p = 0.076)。两组的有效率无显著差异(利培酮组:64.7%,奥氮平组:73.3%)。然而,年龄≥70岁的患者对利培酮的反应明显低于<70岁的患者。两组在包括锥体外系症状(EPSs)在内的安全性方面无显著差异。
利培酮和奥氮平在减轻谵妄症状方面同样有效。老年组对利培酮的反应较差。