Flenady V, Mahomed K, Ellwood D, Charles A, Teale G, Chadha Y, Jeffery H, Stacey T, Ibiebele I, Elder M, Khong Y
Mater Mothers' Research Centre, Mater Health Services, Woolloongabba, Qld 4102, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Apr;50(2):138-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01125.x.
Deficiencies in investigation and audit of perinatal deaths result in loss of information thereby limiting strategies for future prevention. The Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand (PSANZ) developed a clinical practice guideline for perinatal mortality in 2004.
To determine the current use and views of the PSANZ guideline, focussing on the investigation and audit aspects of the guideline.
A telephone survey was conducted of lead midwives and doctors working in birth suites of maternity hospitals with over 1000 births per annum in Australia and New Zealand.
Sixty-nine of the 78 eligible hospitals agreed to participate. A total of 133 clinicians were surveyed. Only 42% of clinicians surveyed were aware of the guideline; more midwives than doctors were aware (53 vs 28%). Of those, only 19% had received training in their use and 33% reported never having referred to them in practice. Implementation of even the key guideline recommendations varied. Seventy per cent of respondents reported regularly attending perinatal mortality audit meetings; midwives were less likely than doctors to attend (59 vs 81%). Almost half (45%) of those surveyed reported never receiving feedback from these meetings. The majority of clinicians surveyed agreed that all parents should be approached for consent to an autopsy examination of the baby; however, most (86%) reported the need for clinician training in counselling parents about autopsy.
Effective implementation programmes are urgently required to address suboptimal uptake of best practice guidelines on perinatal mortality audit in Australia and New Zealand.
围产期死亡调查和审核的不足导致信息缺失,从而限制了未来的预防策略。澳大利亚和新西兰围产期协会(PSANZ)在2004年制定了围产期死亡率临床实践指南。
确定PSANZ指南的当前使用情况和观点,重点关注该指南的调查和审核方面。
对澳大利亚和新西兰每年分娩超过1000例的妇产医院产房工作的首席助产士和医生进行电话调查。
78家符合条件的医院中有69家同意参与。共对133名临床医生进行了调查。只有42%的受访临床医生知晓该指南;知晓的助产士比医生更多(53%对28%)。其中,只有19%的人接受过关于使用该指南的培训,33%的人表示在实践中从未参考过该指南。即使是关键的指南建议,其实施情况也各不相同。70%的受访者表示定期参加围产期死亡审核会议;助产士参加会议的可能性低于医生(59%对81%)。近一半(45%)的受访者表示从未从这些会议中收到反馈。大多数受访临床医生同意,应该征求所有父母对婴儿尸体解剖检查的同意;然而,大多数人(86%)表示临床医生在为父母提供关于尸体解剖的咨询方面需要培训。
迫切需要有效的实施方案,以解决澳大利亚和新西兰围产期死亡审核最佳实践指南采用率不理想的问题。