Scialfa C T, Adams E M, Giovanetto M
Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Optom Vis Sci. 1991 Apr;68(4):270-4. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199104000-00003.
To assess the reliability of the Vistech Contrast Test System (VCTS), contrast sensitivity functions (CSF's) were estimated using all forms of the VCTS in 92 subjects aged 20 to 73 years, who were refracted for the test distance. Over a 3-month period, nine estimates at each spatial frequency and an equivalent number of acuity measures were obtained. The contrast sensitivity of older adults was lower than that of the younger adults, particularly at higher spatial frequencies. Practice effects which varied as a function of spatial frequency were also observed. Reliabilities for single-form estimates of contrast sensitivity (CS) were frequency-dependent, and ranged from 0.41 to 0.65. Three-form average estimates of CS yielded reliabilities ranging from 0.62 to 0.77. Consistent with the assertion that low VCTS reliabilities are due, in part, to measurement error, the reliabilities for acuity were uniformly higher than for the VCTS. Results are discussed in relation to clinical use of the VCTS across the life-span.
为评估Vistech对比测试系统(VCTS)的可靠性,我们使用VCTS的所有形式,对92名年龄在20至73岁之间、已根据测试距离进行验光的受试者进行了对比敏感度函数(CSF)评估。在3个月的时间里,我们在每个空间频率下获得了9次估计值以及同等数量的视力测量值。老年人的对比敏感度低于年轻人,尤其是在较高空间频率下。还观察到了随空间频率变化的练习效应。对比敏感度(CS)单形式估计的可靠性取决于频率,范围为0.41至0.65。CS的三形式平均估计的可靠性范围为0.62至0.77。与低VCTS可靠性部分归因于测量误差的观点一致,视力的可靠性始终高于VCTS。本文结合VCTS在整个生命周期中的临床应用对结果进行了讨论。