Sterling Research Group, Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, USA.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(3):175-86. doi: 10.2165/11533430-000000000-00000.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combinations of rosuvastatin and fenofibric acid (rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid) compared with simvastatin in patients with high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides (TG).
Combination therapy with a statin and a fibrate is one of the treatment options to manage multiple lipid abnormalities in patients with hypercholesterolemia and elevated TGs.
In this randomized, double-blind study, patients (n = 474) with LDL-C > or =160 mg/dL and < or =240 mg/dL and TG > or =150 mg/dL and <400 mg/dL were treated for 8 weeks with simvastatin 40 mg, rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 5 mg/135 mg, rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 10 mg/135 mg, or rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 20 mg/135 mg. Primary and secondary variables were mean percent changes in LDL-C comparing rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 20 mg/135 mg with simvastatin 40 mg and rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 10 mg/135 mg and rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 5 mg/135 mg with simvastatin 40 mg, respectively. Additional efficacy variables included non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), apolipoprotein (Apo) B, HDL-C, TG, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Safety was evaluated based on data collected for adverse events (AEs), physical and electrocardiographic examinations, vital sign measurements, and clinical laboratory tests.
Significantly greater reductions in LDL-C levels from baseline values were observed with the combination of rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 20 mg/135 mg (-47.2%, p < 0.001), rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 10 mg/135 mg (-46.0%, p < 0.001), and rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 5 mg/135 mg (-38.9%, p = 0.007) than with simvastatin 40 mg (-32.8%). Significant (p < or = 0.04 for all comparisons) improvements in non-HDL-C, ApoB, HDL-C, TG, and hsCRP levels were also observed with each of the rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid doses as compared with simvastatin 40 mg. Treatment-related AEs and discontinuations due to AEs were similar across groups. The incidence of serious AEs was 0% with simvastatin 40 mg, 3.4% with rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 5 mg/135 mg, 0.8% with rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 10 mg/135 mg, and 2.5% with rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid 20 mg/135 mg. No cases of rhabdomyolysis or drug-related myopathy were reported.
In patients with high LDL-C and TG levels, combination treatment with rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid was well tolerated, and each of the rosuvastatin/fenofibric acid doses produced greater reductions in LDL-C and improvements in other efficacy parameters, compared with simvastatin 40 mg. [Clinical trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00812955.].
评估固定剂量的瑞舒伐他汀与非诺贝特(瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特)联合治疗与辛伐他汀相比在高 LDL-C 和 TG 水平的患者中的疗效和安全性。
联合使用他汀类药物和贝特类药物是治疗高胆固醇血症和升高的 TG 患者多种血脂异常的治疗选择之一。
在这项随机、双盲研究中,LDL-C >或=160mg/dL 且<或=240mg/dL 和 TG >或=150mg/dL 且<400mg/dL 的患者(n=474)接受 8 周的治疗,治疗方案为辛伐他汀 40mg、瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 5mg/135mg、瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 10mg/135mg 或瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 20mg/135mg。主要和次要变量分别为与辛伐他汀 40mg 相比,瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 20mg/135mg 和瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 10mg/135mg 以及瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 5mg/135mg 使 LDL-C 平均百分比变化。其他疗效变量包括非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(非-HDL-C)、载脂蛋白(Apo)B、HDL-C、TG 和高敏 C 反应蛋白(hsCRP)。安全性基于不良事件(AE)、身体和心电图检查、生命体征测量和临床实验室检查的数据进行评估。
与辛伐他汀 40mg 相比,瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 20mg/135mg(-47.2%,p<0.001)、瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 10mg/135mg(-46.0%,p<0.001)和瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 5mg/135mg(-38.9%,p=0.007)组合使 LDL-C 水平从基线值的降低更显著。与辛伐他汀 40mg 相比,各瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特剂量还显著(p<或=0.04)改善了非-HDL-C、ApoB、HDL-C、TG 和 hsCRP 水平。各组之间的治疗相关 AE 和因 AE 而停药相似。辛伐他汀 40mg 组的严重 AE 发生率为 0%,瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 5mg/135mg 组为 3.4%,瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 10mg/135mg 组为 0.8%,瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特 20mg/135mg 组为 2.5%。没有报告横纹肌溶解症或药物相关性肌病的病例。
在 LDL-C 和 TG 水平较高的患者中,与辛伐他汀 40mg 相比,瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特联合治疗耐受性良好,与瑞舒伐他汀/非诺贝特的每种剂量相比,LDL-C 降低更多,其他疗效参数也得到改善。[临床试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT00812955。]