Suppr超能文献

瑞舒伐他汀与胆碱非诺贝特固定剂量复方制剂和瑞舒伐他汀与非诺贝特固定剂量复方制剂治疗混合性血脂异常患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项针对印度人群的随机、开放标签、多中心临床试验

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Fixed Dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Choline Fenofibrate to Fixed Dose Combination of Rosuvastatin and Fenofibrate in Patients of Mixed Dyslipidemia: A Randomized, Open-label, Multicentre Clinical Trial in Indian Population.

作者信息

Barkate Hanmant, Patel Piyush, Shah Dimple, Vyas Falgun

机构信息

Medical Services, Intas Pharmaceuticals Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

Medical Services, Lambda Therapeutic Research Limited, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

出版信息

Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 Sep-Oct;22(5):627-631. doi: 10.4103/ijem.IJEM_321_16.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of rosuvastatin and choline fenofibrate in comparison to rosuvastatin and fenofibrate FDC among Indian patients of mixed dyslipidemia. This would be a first study evaluating FDC of rosuvastatin and choline fenofibrate in Indian population.

METHODS

A multicenter, open-label, randomized, active controlled, comparative, parallel-design study was conducted at 12 centers spread all across India. Mixed dyslipidemic patients aged 18-70 years were randomized to FDC of rosuvastatin 10 mg and choline fenofibrate 135 mg (RCF group) and FDC of rosuvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 160 mg (RF group) once daily for approximately 180 days. The primary endpoint of study was percentage change in serum triglyceride level at the end of study from baseline.

RESULTS

Of 290 patients screened, 240 patients were enrolled in this study (120 patients in each group). At the end of 180 days, there was a significant reduction in triglyceride level in both the groups (-37.7% in RCF group and -37.8% reduction in RF group; < 0.0001 for both); however, the difference between both the groups was not statistically significant ( = 0.94). Similarly, there was significant increase ( < 0.0001 for both) in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in both groups (+17.8% in RCF group and +14.9% in rosuvastatin fenofibrate RF group). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), very low-LDL (VLDL-C), and total cholesterol were also reduced significantly in both groups ( < 0.0001). However, the difference between two groups for increase in HDL-C and decrease in LDL-C, VLDL-C, and total cholesterol was not significant. Both the treatments were safe and well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Overall, FDC of rosuvastatin and choline fenofibrate is as safe and effective as rosuvastatin and fenofibrate combination in Indian patients with mixed dyslipidemia with added advantage improved patient compliance as it can be taken irrespective of intake of food.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估瑞舒伐他汀与胆碱非诺贝特固定剂量复方制剂(FDC)相较于瑞舒伐他汀与非诺贝特FDC在印度混合性血脂异常患者中的安全性和有效性。这将是第一项在印度人群中评估瑞舒伐他汀与胆碱非诺贝特FDC的研究。

方法

在印度各地的12个中心进行了一项多中心、开放标签、随机、活性对照、比较、平行设计的研究。年龄在18至70岁的混合性血脂异常患者被随机分为瑞舒伐他汀10毫克与胆碱非诺贝特135毫克的FDC组(RCF组)和瑞舒伐他汀10毫克与非诺贝特160毫克的FDC组(RF组),每日一次,持续约180天。研究的主要终点是研究结束时血清甘油三酯水平相对于基线的百分比变化。

结果

在筛选的290名患者中,有240名患者纳入本研究(每组120名患者)。在180天结束时,两组的甘油三酯水平均显著降低(RCF组降低37.7%,RF组降低37.8%;两组均P<0.0001);然而,两组之间的差异无统计学意义(P=0.94)。同样,两组的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)均显著升高(两组均P<0.0001)(RCF组升高17.8%,瑞舒伐他汀非诺贝特RF组升高14.9%)。两组的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)、极低密度脂蛋白(VLDL-C)和总胆固醇也显著降低(P<0.0001)。然而,两组在HDL-C升高以及LDL-C、VLDL-C和总胆固醇降低方面的差异不显著。两种治疗方法均安全且耐受性良好。

结论

总体而言,在印度混合性血脂异常患者中,瑞舒伐他汀与胆碱非诺贝特的FDC与瑞舒伐他汀和非诺贝特联合用药一样安全有效,且具有改善患者依从性的额外优势,因为它可以在不考虑食物摄入的情况下服用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7e88/6166558/09d70e9686f1/IJEM-22-627-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验