• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科学取证:研究诚信办公室如何在监督审查期间协助机构对研究不端行为进行调查。

Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.

机构信息

Division of Investigative Oversight, Office of Research Integrity, Tower Oaks Building, Suite 750, 1101 Wootton Parkway, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Dec;16(4):713-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4. Epub 2010 Jun 5.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4
PMID:20526693
Abstract

The Division of Investigative Oversight within the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is responsible for conducting oversight review of institutional inquiries and investigations of possible research misconduct. It is also responsible for determining whether Public Health Service findings of research misconduct are warranted. Although ORI findings rely primarily on the scope and quality of the institution's analyses and determinations, ORI often has been able to strengthen the original findings by employing a variety of analytical methods, often computer based. Although ORI does not conduct inquiries or investigations, it has broad authority to provide assistance to institutions at all stages of their reviews of allegations. This assistance can range from providing advice on best practices, to legal assistance, to suggestions for how best to investigate specific allegations. When asked, ORI can also conduct certain forensic analyses, such as a statistical examination of questioned digits or a simple examination of a questioned figure in Photoshop. ORI will not provide opinions or render judgment on such analyses while the institution is still conducting its investigation. Such analyses can be done without knowing much else about the case.

摘要

美国研究诚信办公室(ORI)的调查监督司负责对机构调查和可能的研究不端行为进行监督审查。它还负责确定是否有正当理由对公共卫生服务机构的研究不端行为进行调查。尽管 ORI 的调查结果主要依赖于机构分析和确定的范围和质量,但 ORI 通常能够通过采用各种分析方法(通常是基于计算机的方法)来加强原始调查结果。虽然 ORI 不进行调查或调查,但它具有广泛的权力,可以在机构审查指控的各个阶段向其提供协助。这种协助可以从提供最佳实践建议到法律协助,再到如何最好地调查具体指控的建议。应要求,ORI 还可以进行某些法医分析,例如对有疑问的数字进行统计检查,或者对 Photoshop 中的有疑问的数字进行简单检查。在机构仍在进行调查时,ORI 不会对这些分析发表意见或进行判断。在不了解案件其他情况的情况下,就可以进行此类分析。

相似文献

1
Scientific forensics: how the Office of Research Integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review.科学取证:研究诚信办公室如何在监督审查期间协助机构对研究不端行为进行调查。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Dec;16(4):713-35. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9208-4. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
2
Incarceration, restitution, and lifetime debarment: legal consequences of scientific misconduct in the Eric Poehlman case: Commentary on: "Scientific forensics: how the office of research integrity can assist institutional investigations of research misconduct during oversight review".监禁、赔偿和终身禁止:埃里克·波尔曼案中科研不端行为的法律后果:述评:“科学取证:研究诚信办公室如何在监督审查期间协助机构对科研不端行为进行调查”。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2010 Dec;16(4):737-41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9228-0. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
3
The Essential Need for Research Misconduct Allegation Audits.研究不当行为指控审计的必要性
Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Aug;22(4):1027-1049. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9798-6. Epub 2016 Jun 27.
4
Scientific misconduct and research integrity for the bench scientist.基础科研人员的科研不端行为与研究诚信
Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 2000 Sep;224(4):220-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22425.x.
5
Office of Research Integrity: a reflection of disputes and misunderstandings.科研诚信办公室:争议与误解的反映。
Croat Med J. 1999 Sep;40(3):321-5.
6
Walters and Richards comment on the examination of terminal digits of questioned data as used by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) of the Public Health Service in misconduct cases.沃尔特斯和理查兹对美国公共卫生服务部研究诚信办公室(ORI)在不当行为案件中对可疑数据末位数字的审查发表了评论。
IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. 2002 Nov-Dec;21(6):8-9; author reply 9-11.
7
Scientific misconduct and research integrity: federal definitions and approaches.科学不端行为与研究诚信:联邦定义及方法
Prof Ethics. 1999 Spring;7(1):9-32. doi: 10.5840/profethics1999711.
8
Toward global standardization of conducting fair investigations of allegations of research misconduct.致力于对研究不端行为指控进行公平调查的全球标准化。
Account Res. 2020 Aug;27(6):327-346. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1747019. Epub 2020 May 12.
9
Scientific fraud and misconduct.科学欺诈与不当行为。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1991 Dec;11(6):337-8.
10
Anonymity and pseudonymity in whistleblowing to the U.S. Office of Research Integrity.向美国研究诚信办公室举报时的匿名和化名情况。
Acad Med. 1998 May;73(5):467-72. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199805000-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: Stage 1 of the INSPECT-SR Project.一项识别问题研究检测方法的专家调查:INSPECT-SR项目的第一阶段。
medRxiv. 2024 Mar 25:2024.03.18.24304479. doi: 10.1101/2024.03.18.24304479.
2
Misconduct in research: a descriptive survey of attitudes, perceptions and associated factors in a developing country.研究中的不当行为:对一个发展中国家的态度、认知及相关因素的描述性调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 25;15:25. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-25.
3
Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria.

本文引用的文献

1
Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: lessons from the Poehlman case.科研不端行为、撤稿与医学文献净化:波埃尔曼案的教训
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):609-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-8-200604180-00123. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
2
The Poehlman case: running away from the truth.波埃尔曼案:逃避真相。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2006 Jan;12(1):157-73. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0016-9.
3
Scientists behaving badly.行为不端的科学家。
尼日利亚一组研究人员中科学不端行为的流行率。
Dev World Bioeth. 2013 Dec;13(3):149-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2012.00339.x. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
Nature. 2005 Jun 9;435(7043):737-8. doi: 10.1038/435737a.
4
Changes in energy balance and body composition at menopause: a controlled longitudinal study.更年期能量平衡和身体成分的变化:一项对照纵向研究。
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Nov 1;123(9):673-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-9-199511010-00005.