Counseling and Consultation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1012, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):350-5. doi: 10.1037/a0019187.
The structure of the Outcome Questionnaire-45 (Lambert et al., 2001) was examined in a sample of 1,100 university counseling center clients using confirmatory factor analysis. Specifically, the relative fit of 1-factor, 3-factor orthogonal, 3-factor oblique, 4-factor hierarchical, and 4-factor bilevel models were examined. Although the 3-factor oblique, 4-factor hierarchical, and 4-factor bilevel models fit the data well, the 4-factor bilevel model fit the data best. The results provided support for the fit of the 4-factor bilevel model where each item loads on 1 of the 3 independent scales of Symptom Distress, Social Role Performance, and Interpersonal Relations, in addition to a nonoverlapping general distress factor.
采用验证性因素分析方法,对 1100 名大学咨询中心客户的样本进行了《结局问卷-45 项》(Outcome Questionnaire-45,Lambert 等人,2001)的结构检验。具体而言,检验了单因素、3 因素正交、3 因素斜交、4 因素层次和 4 因素双层模型的相对拟合度。尽管 3 因素斜交、4 因素层次和 4 因素双层模型拟合数据良好,但 4 因素双层模型拟合数据最佳。结果支持 4 因素双层模型的拟合,其中每个项目都加载在症状困扰、社会角色表现和人际关系这 3 个独立量表中的 1 个量表上,以及一个非重叠的一般困扰因素上。