Suppr超能文献

单一皮瓣方法联合/不联合引导组织再生及羟磷灰石生物材料治疗骨内牙周缺损。

Single flap approach with and without guided tissue regeneration and a hydroxyapatite biomaterial in the management of intraosseous periodontal defects.

机构信息

Research Centre for the Study of Periodontal Diseases, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2010 Sep;81(9):1256-63. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100113.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The single flap approach (SFA) is a minimally invasive procedure designed for periodontal reconstructive procedures of intraosseous periodontal defects characterized by a dominant unilateral, buccal or oral, extension. This study evaluates the adjunctive effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) combined with a hydroxyapatite (HA) biomaterial in the management of intraosseous periodontal defects accessed with SFA compared to SFA alone.

METHODS

Twenty-four intraosseous defects (in 24 patients) were randomly allocated to treatment with SFA or SFA + HA/GTR. Clinical outcomes were assessed 6 months post-surgery.

RESULTS

Five sites in the SFA + HA/GTR group showed incomplete closure at week 2, which resolved spontaneously. There were no statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in mean (+/-SD) clinical attachment gain (4.7 +/- 2.5 versus 4.4 +/- 1.5 mm), probing depth reduction (5.3 +/- 2.4 versus 5.3 +/- 1.5 mm), and gingival recession increase (0.4 +/- 1.4 versus 0.8 +/- 0.8 mm) between the SFA + HA/GTR and SFA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SFA with and without HA/GTR seems to be a valuable minimally invasive approach in the treatment of deep intraosseous periodontal defects. Under the present experimental conditions, the additional HA/GTR protocol offers no significant adjunctive effect.

摘要

背景

单瓣法(SFA)是一种微创程序,专为具有主导性单侧颊侧或口侧扩展的骨内牙周缺损的牙周重建程序而设计。本研究评估了引导组织再生(GTR)联合羟磷灰石(HA)生物材料在 SFA 辅助治疗骨内牙周缺损中的附加效果,与单独使用 SFA 相比。

方法

将 24 个骨内缺损(24 例患者)随机分为 SFA 或 SFA+HA/GTR 治疗组。术后 6 个月评估临床结果。

结果

SFA+HA/GTR 组的 5 个部位在第 2 周时出现不完全闭合,但自行解决。SFA+HA/GTR 组与 SFA 组的平均(+/-SD)临床附着增加(4.7 +/- 2.5 毫米与 4.4 +/- 1.5 毫米)、探诊深度减少(5.3 +/- 2.4 毫米与 5.3 +/- 1.5 毫米)和牙龈退缩增加(0.4 +/- 1.4 毫米与 0.8 +/- 0.8 毫米)之间无统计学显著或临床有意义的差异。

结论

SFA 联合和不联合 HA/GTR 似乎是治疗深骨内牙周缺损的一种有价值的微创方法。在目前的实验条件下,额外的 HA/GTR 方案没有提供明显的附加效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验