Suppr超能文献

要求被暂停驾驶资格的醉酒驾车者安装酒精锁以恢复其驾照:有效吗?

Requiring suspended drunk drivers to install alcohol interlocks to reinstate their licenses: effective?

机构信息

Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, 11720 Beltsville Drive, Calverton, MD 20705-3111, USA.

出版信息

Addiction. 2010 Aug;105(8):1422-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02987.x. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate a new method being used by some states for motivating interlock installation by requiring it as a prerequisite to reinstatement of the driver's license.

DESIGN

The driving records of Florida DWI offenders convicted between July 2002 and June 2008 were analyzed to determine the proportion of offenders subject to the interlock requirement who installed interlocks.

SETTING

Most driving-while-impaired (DWI) offenders succeed in avoiding state laws requiring the installation of a vehicle alcohol interlock.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 82 318 Florida DWI offenders.

FINDINGS

Due to long periods of complete suspension when no driving was permitted and the failure to complete all the requirements imposed by the court, only 21 377 of the 82 318 offenders studied qualified for reinstatement, but 93% of those who qualified did install interlocks to be reinstated.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the lengthy license suspensions and other barriers that the offenders face in qualifying for reinstatement, it is not clear that requiring a period on the interlock as a prerequisite to reinstating will greatly increase the current installment rate.

摘要

目的

评估一些州正在使用的一种新方法,通过要求将其作为恢复驾照的先决条件来激励安装酒精锁。

设计

分析了佛罗里达州 2002 年 7 月至 2008 年 6 月期间被判犯有酒后驾车罪的司机的驾驶记录,以确定受酒精锁要求约束的罪犯中安装酒精锁的比例。

地点

大多数酒后驾车(DWI)罪犯成功避免了要求安装车辆酒精锁的州法律。

参与者

共 82318 名佛罗里达州 DWI 罪犯。

发现

由于完全暂停驾驶的时间很长,并且没有完成法院规定的所有要求,只有 82318 名罪犯中有 21377 名符合恢复驾驶资格的条件,但符合条件的罪犯中有 93%安装了酒精锁以恢复驾驶资格。

结论

由于驾照暂停时间长,以及罪犯在符合恢复驾驶资格方面面临的其他障碍,要求在恢复驾驶前在酒精锁上设定一段时间作为先决条件,是否能显著提高目前的安装率尚不清楚。

相似文献

3
Interlocks for first offenders: effective?针对初犯者的连锁措施:有效吗?
Traffic Inj Prev. 2007 Dec;8(4):346-52. doi: 10.1080/15389580701598559.

本文引用的文献

1
Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism.用于减少酒后驾车累犯的酒精点火联锁计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;2004(4):CD004168. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004168.pub2.
2
Barriers to interlock implementation.联锁实施的障碍。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2003 Sep;4(3):183-7. doi: 10.1080/15389580309887.
3
Forfeiture programs in California: why so few?加利福尼亚州的没收计划:为何如此之少?
J Safety Res. 2002 Summer;33(2):245-58. doi: 10.1016/s0022-4375(02)00015-4.
4
Vehicle action: effective policy for controlling drunk and other high-risk drivers?
Accid Anal Prev. 2002 May;34(3):263-70. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00025-2.
5
Have the courts and the motor vehicle departments adequate power to control the hard-core drunk driver?
Addiction. 2001 Dec;96(12):1701-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961217011.x.
8
Effects of license revocation on drunk-driving offenders.吊销驾照对酒驾违法者的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 1988 Oct;20(5):379-91. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(88)90020-6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验