Suppr超能文献

教学和评估形式对心电图解读技能的影响。

Impact of teaching and assessment format on electrocardiogram interpretation skills.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Pneumology, University Hospital Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Med Educ. 2010 Jul;44(7):731-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03687.x. Epub 2010 May 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Interpretation of the electrocardiogram (ECG) is a core clinical skill that should be developed in undergraduate medical education. This study assessed whether small-group peer teaching is more effective than lectures in enhancing medical students' ECG interpretation skills. In addition, the impact of assessment format on study outcome was analysed.

METHODS

Two consecutive cohorts of Year 4 medical students (n=335) were randomised to receive either traditional ECG lectures or the same amount of small-group, near-peer teaching during a 6-week cardiorespiratory course. Before and after the course, written assessments of ECG interpretation skills were undertaken. Whereas this final assessment yielded a considerable amount of credit points for students in the first cohort, it was merely formative in nature for the second cohort. An unannounced retention test was applied 8 weeks after the end of the cardiovascular course.

RESULTS

A significant advantage of near-peer teaching over lectures (effect size 0.33) was noted only in the second cohort, whereas, in the setting of a summative assessment, both teaching formats appeared to be equally effective. A summative instead of a formative assessment doubled the performance increase (Cohen's d 4.9 versus 2.4), mitigating any difference between teaching formats. Within the second cohort, the significant difference between the two teaching formats was maintained in the retention test (p=0.017). However, in both cohorts, a significant decrease in student performance was detected during the 8 weeks following the cardiovascular course.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment format appeared to be more powerful than choice of instructional method in enhancing student learning. The effect observed in the second cohort was masked by an overriding incentive generated by the summative assessment in the first cohort. This masking effect should be considered in studies assessing the effectiveness of different teaching methods.

摘要

目的

心电图(ECG)解读是本科医学教育中应培养的一项核心临床技能。本研究旨在评估小组同伴教学是否比讲座更能提高医学生的心电图解读技能,并分析评估方式对学习效果的影响。

方法

将连续两届四年级医学生(n=335)随机分为接受传统心电图讲座或相同数量小组、近邻同伴教学的两组,在 6 周的心肺课程中进行。课程前后均进行心电图解读技能的书面评估。虽然第一组的最终评估对学生有相当多的学分,但第二组的评估仅具有形成性。在心血管课程结束 8 周后进行了一次未事先通知的保留测试。

结果

仅在第二组中,近邻教学明显优于讲座(效应大小 0.33),而在总结性评估中,两种教学方式似乎同样有效。总结性评估而非形成性评估将成绩提高了一倍(Cohen's d 4.9 对 2.4),减轻了教学方式之间的任何差异。在第二组中,在保留测试中,两种教学方式之间的显著差异得以维持(p=0.017)。然而,在两个组中,在心血管课程结束后的 8 周内,学生的表现都显著下降。

结论

评估方式似乎比教学方法的选择更能增强学生的学习效果。在第一组的总结性评估产生的压倒性激励下,第二组观察到的效果被掩盖了。在评估不同教学方法的有效性时,应考虑这种掩盖效应。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验