Griswold J A, Anglin B L, Love R T, Scott-Conner C
Department of Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, School of Medicine, Jackson 39216-4505.
South Med J. 1991 Jun;84(6):692-6.
Many have discussed hypertonic saline for resuscitation in burned patients only to discourage its use or to emphasize it only as a research tool and not as standard resuscitation. We reviewed the records of 47 adults with burns over 20% or more of the total body surface area (TBSA) in whom hypertonic saline was used as standard resuscitation fluid in a large community burn unit. The solution consisted of sodium, 300 mEq/L, acetate, 200 mEq/L, and chloride, 100 mEq/L, with an osmolality of 600 mOsm/L. The mean TBSA burned was 37% and the mean patient age was 44.8 years. Eighteen patients (mean age 39.7 years, mean TBSA burned 27%) received hypertonic saline alone. They required an average of 75% of the Parkland calculated volume to achieve a urinary output of 1 mL/kg/hr. The mean hematocrit value over the first 48 hours was 44.2% and the mean serum sodium level was 141.6 mEq/L. Twenty-nine patients (mean age 51.8 years, mean TBSA burned 47.8%) received hypertonic saline plus colloid (albumin or fresh frozen plasma). Colloid was used in older patients with more serious burns. This group required 57% of the Parkland calculated volume to achieve a urinary output of 1 mL/kg/hr. The mean hematocrit value was 45.1% and mean sodium level was 143.8 mEq/L. The mean weight gain for both groups was 7.3% of the admission weight. None of the patients had changes in pH or renal function. All patients survived the resuscitation phase of their injury; the overall death rate was 49%. We conclude that hypertonic saline is a safe, effective means of resuscitation even in a community-based unit. It allows less fluid to be delivered for adequate resuscitation. The usual hyponatremia, hemoconcentration, and significant weight gain associated with administration of isotonic solutions was avoided. Colloid may further improve the resuscitation capabilities of hypertonic saline.
许多人讨论过用高渗盐水对烧伤患者进行复苏,但只是不鼓励使用,或者仅强调其作为研究工具而非标准复苏方法。我们回顾了一家大型社区烧伤中心47例成年烧伤患者的记录,这些患者的烧伤面积超过总体表面积(TBSA)的20%,在该中心高渗盐水被用作标准复苏液。该溶液含钠300 mEq/L、醋酸盐200 mEq/L、氯化物100 mEq/L,渗透压为600 mOsm/L。平均烧伤TBSA为37%,患者平均年龄为44.8岁。18例患者(平均年龄39.7岁,平均烧伤TBSA为27%)仅接受高渗盐水治疗。他们平均需要帕克兰公式计算量的75%才能达到1 mL/kg/hr的尿量。最初48小时的平均血细胞比容值为44.2%,平均血清钠水平为141.6 mEq/L。29例患者(平均年龄51.8岁,平均烧伤TBSA为47.8%)接受高渗盐水加胶体(白蛋白或新鲜冰冻血浆)治疗。胶体用于烧伤更严重的老年患者。该组患者需要帕克兰公式计算量的57%才能达到1 mL/kg/hr的尿量。平均血细胞比容值为45.1%,平均钠水平为143.8 mEq/L。两组患者的平均体重增加量为入院体重的7.3%。所有患者的pH值和肾功能均无变化。所有患者均度过了损伤的复苏阶段;总体死亡率为49%。我们得出结论,即使在社区医院,高渗盐水也是一种安全、有效的复苏手段。它在充分复苏时所需输注的液体量较少。避免了与输注等渗溶液相关的常见低钠血症、血液浓缩和显著体重增加。胶体可能会进一步提高高渗盐水的复苏能力。