围产期窒息治疗中使用的冷却方法比较。

A comparison of cooling methods used in therapeutic hypothermia for perinatal asphyxia.

机构信息

Child Health, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, St Michael's Hospital, Bristol, Avon, UK.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2010 Jul;126(1):e124-30. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2995. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare cooling methods during therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for moderate or severe perinatal asphyxia with regard to temperature and hemodynamic stability.

METHODS

A total of 73 newborns received TH in our center between 1999 and 2009 by 4 methods: (1) selective head cooling with mild systemic hypothermia by using cap (SHC; n = 20); (2) whole-body cooling with mattress manually controlled (WBCmc; n = 23); (3) whole-body cooling with body wrap servo-controlled (WBCsc; n = 28); and (4) whole-body cooling with water-filled gloves (n = 2). Target rectal temperatures (Trec) were 34.5 +/- 0.5 degrees C (SHC) and 33.5 +/- 0.5 degrees C (WBC). Trec, mean arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were collected from retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Groups had similar baseline characteristics and condition at birth. Trec was within target temperature +/-0.5 degree C for 97% of the time in infants with WBCsc, 81% in infants with WBCmc, 76% in infants with SHC, and 74% in infants who were cooled with gloves. Mean overshoot was 0.3 degree C for WBCsc, 1.3 degrees C for WBCmc, and 0.8 degree C for SHC groups. There was no difference in mean arterial blood pressure or mean heart between groups during the maintenance of cooling. In infants who were rewarmed at similar speed, there was greater variation in Trec in the SHC compared with the WBCsc group.

CONCLUSIONS

Manually controlled cooling systems are associated with greater variability in Trec compared with servo-controlled systems. A manual mattress often causes initial overcooling. It is unknown whether large variation in temperature adversely affects the neuroprotection of TH.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较中度或重度围产期窒息新生儿接受治疗性低温(TH)时的冷却方法,重点关注体温和血液动力学稳定性。

方法

1999 年至 2009 年期间,共有 73 例新生儿在本中心接受 TH,采用 4 种方法:(1)使用帽子进行选择性头部冷却加轻度全身亚低温(SHC;n = 20);(2)手动控制床垫的全身冷却(WBCmc;n = 23);(3)伺服控制身体包裹的全身冷却(WBCsc;n = 28);和(4)使用充满水的手套进行全身冷却(n = 2)。目标直肠温度(Trec)为 34.5 ± 0.5°C(SHC)和 33.5 ± 0.5°C(WBC)。从回顾性图表中收集 Trec、平均动脉血压和心率数据。

结果

各组具有相似的基线特征和出生时状况。WBCsc 组 97%的时间 Trec 在目标温度±0.5°C 内,WBCmc 组 81%,SHC 组 76%,手套冷却组 74%。WBCsc 组的平均超调量为 0.3°C,WBCmc 组为 1.3°C,SHC 组为 0.8°C。在维持冷却期间,各组之间的平均动脉血压或平均心率无差异。以相似速度复温的婴儿中,SHC 组的 Trec 变化较大。

结论

与伺服控制冷却系统相比,手动控制冷却系统与 Trec 的变异性更大。手动床垫通常会导致初始过度冷却。温度的大幅波动是否会对 TH 的神经保护产生不利影响尚不清楚。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索