Sarkar Subrata, Barks John D, Bhagat Indira, Dechert Ronald, Donn Steven M
Department of Pediatrics, Toledo Children's Hospital, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Am J Perinatol. 2009 Apr;26(4):265-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1103154. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
Compared with whole body cooling (WBC), selective head cooling (SHC) of asphyxiated newborns presumably allows effective brain cooling with less systemic hypothermia and potentially fewer systemic adverse effects. It is not known if pulmonary dysfunction, one of the potential adverse systemic effects of therapeutic hypothermic neuroprotection, differs with the method of cooling. We sought to investigate if pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange during therapeutic hypothermia differ between WBC and SHC. The severity of pulmonary dysfunction was determined in 59 asphyxiated newborns receiving therapeutic hypothermic neuroprotection by either SHC ( N = 31) or WBC ( N = 28). Ventilatory parameters and simultaneous alveolar-arterial oxygen gradient (A-a DO (2)) and partial pressure of carbon dioxide, arterial (PaCO (2)) were measured before the start of cooling (baseline), and at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours of cooling. The diagnosis of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) was established by echocardiography. Clinical monitoring and treatment during cooling, whether SHC or WBC, were similar. All (96%) but two infants (from the SHC group) required mechanical ventilation of varying duration during cooling, and nine infants (15%) developed PPHN. The baseline ventilator pressures requirement, and A-a DO (2) were similar among the 48 ventilated infants without PPHN (WBC 23, SHC 25) at the start of cooling. Ventilatory requirements remained modest and did not differ with the method of cooling. Similar numbers of infants without PPHN were able to be extubated after improvement in respiratory status while being cooled (WBC 42.8% versus SHC 37.9%, P = 0.79, odds ratio [OR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.4 to 3.5). Nine infants (WBC 5, SHC 4) developed PPHN. Six of the nine (WBC 4, SHC 2) required inhaled nitric oxide therapy, and one infant from the WBC group subsequently required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The incidence of PPHN was similar in both the WBC and SHC groups (17.8% versus 12.9%, P = 0.72, OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.3 to 6.1). Pulmonary dysfunction is common but not severe in asphyxiated infants during therapeutic hypothermia. Pulmonary mechanics and gas exchange do not differ with the method of achieving hypothermia.
与全身降温(WBC)相比,窒息新生儿的选择性头部降温(SHC)可能在减少全身低温及潜在的全身不良反应的情况下实现有效的脑部降温。尚不清楚作为治疗性低温神经保护潜在的全身不良反应之一的肺功能障碍是否因降温方法而异。我们试图研究治疗性低温期间WBC和SHC在肺力学和气体交换方面是否存在差异。在59例接受治疗性低温神经保护的窒息新生儿中确定了肺功能障碍的严重程度,其中31例采用SHC,28例采用WBC。在降温开始前(基线)以及降温4、8、12、24、48和72小时时测量通气参数以及同时测量肺泡 - 动脉氧梯度(A - a DO₂)和动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)。通过超声心动图确诊新生儿持续性肺动脉高压(PPHN)。无论是SHC还是WBC,降温期间的临床监测和治疗均相似。所有(96%)但两名婴儿(来自SHC组)在降温期间需要不同时长的机械通气,9名婴儿(15%)发生了PPHN。在开始降温时,48例无PPHN的通气婴儿(WBC组23例,SHC组25例)的基线呼吸机压力需求和A - a DO₂相似。通气需求维持适度且不因降温方法而异。在降温过程中呼吸状况改善后,无PPHN的婴儿中能够拔管的人数相似(WBC组42.8%对SHC组37.9%,P = 0.79,优势比[OR] 1.2,95%置信区间[CI] 0.4至3.5)。9名婴儿(WBC组5例,SHC组4例)发生了PPHN。9例中的6例(WBC组4例,SHC组2例)需要吸入一氧化氮治疗,WBC组的1名婴儿随后需要体外膜肺氧合。WBC组和SHC组PPHN的发生率相似(17.8%对12.9%,P = 0.72,OR 1.5,95% CI 0.3至6.1)。在治疗性低温期间,肺功能障碍在窒息婴儿中很常见但并不严重。肺力学和气体交换不因实现低温的方法而异。