Suppr超能文献

男性主动脉僵硬度的前瞻性风险因素分析:卡菲利前瞻性研究 20 年随访结果。

An analysis of prospective risk factors for aortic stiffness in men: 20-year follow-up from the Caerphilly prospective study.

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 110, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.

出版信息

Hypertension. 2010 Jul;56(1):36-43. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.150896. Epub 2010 Jun 7.

Abstract

Arterial stiffness is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk. The precise risk factors for arterial stiffening remain unclear. We aimed to identify potential risk factors using prospective exposure data from the Caerphilly Prospective Study. Aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index were measured in 825 men and related to current (2004) and baseline (1979-1988) anthropometric, hemodynamic, and biochemical factors. The mean age of the men was 74 years, with an average follow-up of 20 years. The only independent baseline predictors of current velocity were pulse pressure (standardized beta-coefficient: 0.58), C-reactive protein (0.35), glucose (0.25), and waist circumference (0.23). The sole baseline predictor of current augmentation index was fibrinogen (0.78). After additional adjustment for the corresponding current risk factor, pulse wave velocity was best related to cumulative exposure to C-reactive protein, whereas augmentation index was most strongly related to current levels. Velocity was also more strongly correlated with baseline levels of triglycerides and smoking but with current waist circumference. The pulse pressure heart rate product assessed over the whole of 20 years was independently correlated with aortic pulse wave velocity but not augmentation index. Other than blood pressure, established cardiovascular risk factors have only a modest effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflection. Inflammation and the level of repetitive cyclic stress are important predictors of aortic stiffness, whereas wave reflection is predicted by acute inflammation only. Adequate control of pulse pressure and heart rate, as well as reducing inflammation, may, in the long-term, retard aortic stiffening, although this remains to be tested directly.

摘要

动脉僵硬度是心血管风险的一个重要决定因素。动脉僵硬度的确切危险因素仍不清楚。我们旨在使用 Caerphilly 前瞻性研究的前瞻性暴露数据来确定潜在的危险因素。在 825 名男性中测量了主动脉脉搏波速度和增强指数,并将其与当前(2004 年)和基线(1979-1988 年)的人体测量、血液动力学和生化因素相关联。男性的平均年龄为 74 岁,平均随访时间为 20 年。当前速度的唯一独立基线预测因子是脉压(标准化β系数:0.58)、C 反应蛋白(0.35)、葡萄糖(0.25)和腰围(0.23)。当前增强指数的唯一基线预测因子是纤维蛋白原(0.78)。在对相应当前危险因素进行额外调整后,脉搏波速度与 C 反应蛋白的累积暴露量最相关,而增强指数与当前水平最相关。速度也与基线甘油三酯和吸烟水平密切相关,但与当前腰围密切相关。20 年来整个评估的脉压心率乘积与主动脉脉搏波速度独立相关,但与增强指数无关。除了血压,既定的心血管危险因素对主动脉僵硬度和波反射的影响仅适度。炎症和重复循环应激的水平是主动脉僵硬度的重要预测因子,而波反射仅由急性炎症预测。长期而言,适当控制脉压和心率以及降低炎症水平可能会延缓主动脉僵硬度,但这仍有待直接测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验