• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析与评论。医疗改革:百年政治战争中的暂时休战。

Analysis & commentary. Health reform: only a cease-fire in a political hundred years' war.

机构信息

American Enterprise Institute, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1101-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0439.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0439
PMID:20530337
Abstract

Four dominant political forces drove the process and product of national health reform during the past two years: federal budget constraints; public concerns about the size and reach of the federal government; the time pressure of the congressional calendar; and the political parties' high-stakes, all-or-nothing bets on what became President Barack Obama's defining policy priority. Republican congressional leaders saw little advantage in offering more detailed alternatives. Congressional Democrats calculated that they had even more to lose politically by abandoning health reform legislation than by pushing it through Congress. This essay argues that passage of the legislation merely represents a cease-fire in a long-standing war and that more battles between forces for "implementation" and those for "repeal and replace" are to come.

摘要

在过去的两年中,有四大主导政治力量推动了国家医疗改革的进程和结果:联邦预算限制;公众对联邦政府规模和影响力的担忧;国会日程的时间压力;以及两党在成为总统巴拉克·奥巴马的决定性政策重点的问题上孤注一掷。共和党国会领导人认为提供更详细的替代方案没有什么好处。国会民主党人认为,放弃医疗改革立法在政治上的损失比将其推向国会更大。本文认为,立法的通过仅仅代表了一场长期战争的停火,而“实施”和“废除和替代”力量之间的更多战斗即将到来。

相似文献

1
Analysis & commentary. Health reform: only a cease-fire in a political hundred years' war.分析与评论。医疗改革:百年政治战争中的暂时休战。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1101-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0439.
2
Presidents and health reform: from Franklin D. Roosevelt to Barack Obama.总统与医疗改革:从富兰克林·德拉诺·罗斯福到巴拉克·奥巴马。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1096-100. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0420.
3
Long time coming: why health reform finally passed.千呼万唤始出来:医改缘何终成功
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1112-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0447.
4
The origins and demise of the public option.公共选择的起源与消亡。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1117-24. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0363.
5
Lessons from the Clinton plan: incremental market reform, not sweeping government control.克林顿计划的经验教训:渐进式市场改革,而非全面政府管控。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 May-Jun;27(3):705-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.705.
6
Could we have covered more people at less cost? Technically, yes; politically, probably not.我们本可以用更低的成本覆盖更多的人吗?从技术上讲,可以;但从政治上讲,可能不行。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1142-6. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0433.
7
From Massachusetts to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: aboard the health reform express.从马萨诸塞州到宾夕法尼亚大道 1600 号:登上医疗改革专列。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun;29(6):1106-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0429.
8
The Clinton health care proposal: reform squandered again!克林顿的医疗保健提案:改革再次被浪费!
Physician Exec. 1996 Jan;22(1):31-8.
9
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010: reforming the health care reform for the new decade.2010 年患者保护与平价医疗法案:为新十年改革医疗改革。
Pain Physician. 2011 Jan-Feb;14(1):E35-67.
10
The Nixon years: failed national health reform from both parties.尼克松时代:两党在全国医疗改革上均告失败。
Physician Exec. 1992 May-Jun;18(3):20-6.