Suppr超能文献

青少年特发性脊柱侧弯患者后路脊柱融合手术中两种切口闭合方法的比较。

Comparison of 2 methods of incision closure in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion surgery.

作者信息

Xu Leilei, Zhu Feng, Zhu Zezhang, Liu Zhen, Sun Xu, Qiao Jun, Mao Saihu, Qiu Yong

机构信息

From The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):E481-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000223.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, and controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To compare surgical zipper with subcuticular Monocryl sutures in terms of incision closure time, cosmetic results, and the complication rate in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In previous literatures, the application of surgical zipper to incision closure has been reported to be associated with a favorable outcome. However, in the PSF surgery of patients with AIS, the use of surgical zipper has not been described.

METHODS

Ninety female patients with AIS undergoing PSF were assigned randomly to 2 incision closure groups either using surgical zipper or using the 4-0 absorbable subcuticular suture. The incision outcome was evaluated with the Hollander Incision Evaluation Score at 7 days, 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, respectively. Besides, a visual analogue scale was allocated to each patient to rate the cosmetic result of the incision. The 2 groups were compared to determine the differences in terms of incision closure time, the complication rate, and cosmetic results.

RESULTS

The incision closure using surgical zipper consumed significantly less time than that using subcuticular suture (45.3 vs. 540.5 s, P < 0.001). As for the cosmetic results, no significant differences of Hollander Incision Evaluation Score scores between the 2 suturing groups were found. Besides, patients' satisfaction with cosmetic outcome on a linear visual analogue scale also revealed similar results between the 2 groups. As for postoperative complications, we found 1 case of mild blister due to allergy to the tape of the dressings and 2 cases of incisional pain in the Monocryl suture group.

CONCLUSION

The application of surgical zipper in PSF surgery is a safe and effective method. The ease and the speed of application make surgical zipper an attractive option for incision closure in patients with AIS undergoing PSF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

摘要

研究设计

一项前瞻性、随机对照临床试验。

目的

比较手术拉链与皮下可吸收莫诺缝线在青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)患者后路脊柱融合术(PSF)中的切口闭合时间、美容效果及并发症发生率。

背景资料总结

既往文献报道,手术拉链用于切口闭合效果良好。然而,在AIS患者的PSF手术中,手术拉链的应用尚未见描述。

方法

90例接受PSF的AIS女性患者被随机分为两组,分别采用手术拉链或4-0可吸收皮下缝线进行切口闭合。分别于术后7天、2周、6个月和1年,采用霍兰德切口评估评分对切口结果进行评估。此外,为每位患者分配一个视觉模拟量表,以评估切口的美容效果。比较两组在切口闭合时间、并发症发生率和美容效果方面的差异。

结果

使用手术拉链闭合切口的时间明显短于使用皮下缝线(45.3秒对540.5秒,P<0.001)。在美容效果方面,两组的霍兰德切口评估评分无显著差异。此外,患者在视觉模拟量表上对美容效果的满意度在两组间也显示出相似的结果。在术后并发症方面,我们发现莫诺缝线组有1例因对敷料胶带过敏出现轻度水疱,2例出现切口疼痛。

结论

手术拉链在PSF手术中的应用是一种安全有效的方法。其应用的简便性和速度使手术拉链成为接受PSF的AIS患者切口闭合的一个有吸引力的选择。

证据级别

4级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验