Suppr超能文献

药物检测的实验室间变异性:质量控制数据与常规患者样本重新分析的比较。II:地高辛。临床药理学与毒理学研究组,意大利临床生物化学学会

Interlaboratory variability in drug assay: a comparison of quality control data with reanalysis of routine patient samples. II: Digoxin. Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology Study Group, Italian Society for Clinical Biochemistry.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1991 Mar;13(2):140-5.

PMID:2053121
Abstract

Fifty-four laboratories providing a serum digoxin monitoring service participated in a 16-month prospective quality control (QC) study that involved (a) determination of spiked QC samples based on a human serum matrix and (b) reanalysis by two to four reference laboratories of patient samples randomly selected among those assayed routinely. Interlaboratory variability on spiked samples was limited, coefficients of variation being usually in the 11-21% range. Correlations between values reported by individual reference laboratories on routine samples were reasonably good irrespective of the techniques used, which were the enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) or the fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). When all data were considered, the correlation between the original routine values and reference results (r = 0.93) was comparable to that observed for the other analytes (phenytoin and theophylline) included in the survey. When subsets of results were evaluated according to the technique used, the agreement between routine and reference results was good for samples originally measured by FPIA (r = 0.96), moderate for samples originally measured by non-EMIT/non-FPIA techniques (r = 0.92), and poor for the few samples originally measured by EMIT (r = 0.55). The poor correlation with EMIT results could be ascribed largely to erratic performance of two individual laboratories. It is concluded that interlaboratory variability in routine drug measurements is greater for digoxin than for other analytes such as phenytoin and theophylline, and that the analytical performance of some laboratories is grossly inaccurate.

摘要

54个提供血清地高辛监测服务的实验室参与了一项为期16个月的前瞻性质量控制(QC)研究,该研究包括:(a)基于人血清基质测定加标QC样品;(b)由两到四个参考实验室对常规检测的患者样品中随机抽取的样品进行重新分析。加标样品的实验室间变异性有限,变异系数通常在11%-21%范围内。无论使用何种技术,即酶放大免疫分析技术(EMIT)或荧光偏振免疫分析(FPIA),各个参考实验室报告的常规样品值之间的相关性都相当好。当考虑所有数据时,原始常规值与参考结果之间的相关性(r = 0.93)与调查中包括的其他分析物(苯妥英和茶碱)所观察到的相关性相当。当根据所使用的技术评估结果子集时,对于最初用FPIA测量的样品,常规结果与参考结果之间的一致性良好(r = 0.96),对于最初用非EMIT/非FPIA技术测量的样品,一致性中等(r = 0.92),而对于最初用EMIT测量的少数样品,一致性较差(r = 0.55)。与EMIT结果的低相关性很大程度上可归因于两个独立实验室的不稳定表现。得出的结论是,地高辛常规药物测量中的实验室间变异性比苯妥英和茶碱等其他分析物更大,并且一些实验室的分析性能严重不准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验