Suppr超能文献

血清地高辛的测定。放射免疫分析与酶免疫分析的比较(作者译)

[Determination of serum digoxin. A comparison between RIA and EIA (author's transl)].

作者信息

Spitz J, Braun J S, Schmidt M

出版信息

Nuklearmedizin. 1979 Dec;18(5):237-40.

PMID:547250
Abstract

The results of two radioimmunoassays (RIA, precipitating technique), of a homogenous (EMIT) and a heterogenous (ELISA) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for ascertaining the amounts of digoxin showed a good correlation in precision and a reasonably satisfying correlation in the recovery. However, there was a clear discrepancy in the amounts of digoxin concentrate in the serum of patients. Only the RIA of Abbott and the EIA of Boehringer showed no significant differences. Particularly noticeable was the tendency towards lower values in the EMIT-technique as well as its liability to unspecific serum changes (lipaemia etc.), which often made the detection of digoxin impossible. The routine use of this technique appears problematic. The need for establishing one's own laboratory and test-specific therapeutical range is pointed out.

摘要

两种用于测定地高辛含量的放射免疫分析(RIA,沉淀技术)、一种均相(EMIT)和一种异相(ELISA)酶免疫分析(EIA)的结果显示,在精密度方面具有良好的相关性,在回收率方面具有相当令人满意的相关性。然而,患者血清中地高辛浓度的测定结果存在明显差异。只有雅培的RIA和勃林格的EIA没有显著差异。特别值得注意的是,EMIT技术有值偏低的趋势,并且容易受到非特异性血清变化(脂血等)的影响,这常常使得地高辛的检测无法进行。该技术的常规使用似乎存在问题。文中指出需要建立自己的实验室并确定特定检测方法的治疗范围。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验