Sciarretta V, Mazzatenta D, Ciarpaglini R, Pasquini E, Farneti G, Frank G
Center of Endoscopic Endonasal Funcional Surgery, ENT Department, Policlinico S. Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010 Apr;53(2):55-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1246161. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
In this article, the aim of the authors is to discuss their experience with skull base reconstruction in endoscopic transsphenoidal and extended transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumor resection.
Between January 1997 and January 2008, 665 patients underwent either transnasal transsphenoidal endoscopic or extended transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumors. In patients without intraoperative CSF leak, we prefer to pack the surgical cavity with absorbable material, such as collagen sponge (Gelfoam), or, in the case of thin diaphragma sellae and postoperative risk of rupture with abdominal fat. In patients with minimal CSF oozing, but without any visible diaphragma sellae defect or only a small dural defect with leak, we pack the surgical cavity with abdominal fat. In case of a leak from an anterior face of the diaphragma sellae defect we prefer to reconstruct the defect by means of mucoperiosteum taken from the resected middle turbinate. Patients with larger sellar or supradiaphragmatic defects were treated with a multilayer reconstruction.
529 patients (79.5%) did not require any repair besides a packing of the surgical cavity with absorbable material such as collagen sponge, while 128 patients (19.2%) required an endoscopic skull base repair at the end of the procedure for an overt CSF leak. 8 patients (1.2%) required repair because of overt thin diaphragma sellae without a visible CSF leak but with a postoperative risk of rupture. Out of the latter two groups (n = 136) only 11 patients (8 %) developed persistent postoperative CSF leaks requiring revision multilayer reconstruction.
More complex defects after pituitary surgery should be repaired with a multilayer technique, using autologous materials such as fat, fascia lata, bone and mucoperiosteum taken from the middle turbinate. This type of autologous material is generally reliable in more complex defects, and it appears to be easy to harvest and handle for repair.
在本文中,作者的目的是讨论他们在内镜经蝶窦和扩大经蝶窦手术切除垂体瘤时进行颅底重建的经验。
1997年1月至2008年1月期间,665例患者接受了经鼻经蝶窦内镜或扩大经蝶窦垂体瘤手术。对于术中无脑脊液漏的患者,我们倾向于用可吸收材料填充手术腔,如胶原海绵(明胶海绵),或者在鞍膈薄且术后有破裂风险的情况下,用腹部脂肪填充。对于脑脊液渗出极少但无可见鞍膈缺损或仅有小的硬膜缺损伴漏液的患者,我们用腹部脂肪填充手术腔。如果鞍膈缺损前表面有漏液,我们倾向于用取自切除的中鼻甲的黏膜骨膜修复缺损。鞍区或鞍上较大缺损的患者采用多层重建治疗。
529例患者(79.5%)除用胶原海绵等可吸收材料填充手术腔外,无需任何修复,而128例患者(19.2%)因明显的脑脊液漏在手术结束时需要进行内镜颅底修复。8例患者(1.2%)因鞍膈明显变薄但无可见脑脊液漏但术后有破裂风险而需要修复。在后两组(n = 136)中,只有11例患者(8%)出现持续性术后脑脊液漏,需要进行翻修多层重建。
垂体手术后更复杂的缺损应采用多层技术修复,使用自体材料,如脂肪、阔筋膜、骨和取自中鼻甲的黏膜骨膜。这种自体材料在更复杂的缺损中通常是可靠的,而且似乎易于获取和用于修复。