• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分子吸附循环系统治疗联合终末期肝病模型在慢性肝衰竭急性发作患者中的预测参数

Predictive parameters after molecular absorbent recirculating system treatment integrated with model for end stage liver disease model in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.

作者信息

Novelli G, Rossi M, Ferretti G, Pugliese F, Travaglia D, Guidi S, Novelli S, Lai Q, Morabito V, Berloco P B

机构信息

Dipartimento P Stefanini Chirurgia Generale e Trapianti d'Organo, La Sapienza Università di Roma, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2010 May;42(4):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.095.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.095
PMID:20534256
Abstract

AIM

The aim of study was to highlight parameters that in association with Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) provide predictive criteria for long-term survival after treatment with the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS). Two homogenous groups were studied: one treated with standard medical therapy (SMT) and the other, with MARS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty acute-on-chronic liver failure patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation and affected by alcoholic cirrhosis with similar MELD scores (20-29) were evaluated for 7 days from inclusion and for 6-month survival. Ten patients (seven males and three females) were treated with MARS. Their mean age was 48.5 years (range = 35-61). The number of MARS applications was six for 6 consecutive days, and the length of the applications was 8 hours. Ten other patients (seven males and three females) were treated with SMT, including prophylaxis against bacterial infections and judicious use of diuretics. The precipitating factors were also treated appropriately. The mean age of the patients was 51 years (range = 37-64). All the variables that were significant upon univariate analysis were enrolled in a receiver operating characteristic analysis, with the intention to detect predictive parameters for patient death at 6 months. We considered a significant area under curve (AUC) value to be greater than 0.5.

RESULTS

Among 11 patients who died within 6 months there were in the MARS group and eight in the SMT group: the 3- and 6-month patient survival rates were 90% and 70% versus 30% and 20% in the two groups, respectively. Nine measures resulted in an AUC > 0.5: DeltaMELD; interleukin (IL)-8; IL-6; tumor necrosis factor- alpha, MELD score; creatinine, bilirubin international normalized ratio (INR) and cardiac index. DeltaMELD and postoperative IL-8 concentrations showed better results (AUC = 0.899), followed by postoperative creatinine (AUC = 0.879), postoperative cardiac index (AUC = 0.833), and postoperative INR (AUC = 0.818). Postoperative creatinine showed the best sensitivity (100%), while IL-8, the best specificity (88.9%).

CONCLUSION

A combination of biochemical and clinical variables probably represent the best way to predict the survival of patients, allowing physicians to select the best therapies for each patient.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在强调与终末期肝病模型(MELD)相关联的参数,这些参数可为分子吸附循环系统(MARS)治疗后的长期生存提供预测标准。研究了两个同质组:一组接受标准药物治疗(SMT),另一组接受MARS治疗。

材料与方法

对20例等待肝移植且患有酒精性肝硬化、MELD评分相似(20 - 29)的急性慢性肝衰竭患者进行了为期7天的纳入评估及6个月生存期的观察。10例患者(7例男性和3例女性)接受MARS治疗。他们的平均年龄为48.5岁(范围 = 35 - 61岁)。MARS应用次数为连续6天每天6次,每次应用时长为8小时。另外10例患者(7例男性和3例女性)接受SMT治疗,包括预防细菌感染和合理使用利尿剂。对诱发因素也进行了适当治疗。这些患者的平均年龄为51岁(范围 = 37 - 64岁)。所有在单因素分析中有显著意义的变量都纳入了受试者工作特征分析,旨在检测6个月时患者死亡的预测参数。我们认为曲线下面积(AUC)值大于0.5具有显著意义。

结果

在6个月内死亡的11例患者中,MARS组有3例,SMT组有8例:两组患者3个月和6个月的生存率分别为90%和70%,以及30%和20%。9项指标的AUC > 0.5:MELD差值;白细胞介素(IL)-8;IL-6;肿瘤坏死因子-α、MELD评分;肌酐、胆红素国际标准化比值(INR)和心脏指数。MELD差值和术后IL-8浓度显示出更好的结果(AUC = 0.899),其次是术后肌酐(AUC = 0.879)、术后心脏指数(AUC = 0.833)和术后INR(AUC = 0.818)。术后肌酐显示出最佳敏感性(100%),而IL-8显示出最佳特异性(88.9%)。

结论

生化和临床变量的组合可能是预测患者生存的最佳方法,可让医生为每位患者选择最佳治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Predictive parameters after molecular absorbent recirculating system treatment integrated with model for end stage liver disease model in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure.分子吸附循环系统治疗联合终末期肝病模型在慢性肝衰竭急性发作患者中的预测参数
Transplant Proc. 2010 May;42(4):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.095.
2
Molecular adsorbents recirculating system treatment in acute-on-chronic hepatitis patients on the transplant waiting list improves model for end-stage liver disease scores.在等待肝移植的慢性乙型肝炎急性发作患者中,分子吸附循环系统治疗可改善终末期肝病模型评分。
Transplant Proc. 2007 Jul-Aug;39(6):1864-7. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.003.
3
Impact of pretransplant MELD score on posttransplant outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with acute-on-chronic hepatitis B liver failure.慢性乙型肝炎急性肝衰竭患者原位肝移植中移植前终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对移植后结局的影响
Transplant Proc. 2007 Jun;39(5):1501-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.02.070.
4
Survival before and after model for end-stage liver disease score introduction on the Brazilian liver transplant waiting list.巴西肝移植等待名单上引入终末期肝病模型评分前后的生存率。
Transplant Proc. 2010 Mar;42(2):412-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.01.028.
5
Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score system to evaluate patients with viral hepatitis on the waiting list: better than the Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) system?用于评估等待肝移植患者的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统:比Child-Turcotte-Pugh(CTP)系统更好吗?
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1906-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.072.
6
Analysis of Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score in a liver transplantation waiting list.肝移植等待名单中终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分分析
Transplant Proc. 2007 Oct;39(8):2511-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.023.
7
Assessment of a modified Child-Pugh-Turcotte score to predict early mortality after liver transplantation.评估改良的Child-Pugh-Turcotte评分以预测肝移植术后早期死亡率。
Transplant Proc. 2009 Oct;41(8):3114-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.098.
8
Pediatric acute liver failure with molecular adsorbent recirculating system treatment.小儿急性肝衰竭的分子吸附循环系统治疗
Transplant Proc. 2008 Jul-Aug;40(6):1921-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.075.
9
Predictive criteria for the outcome of patients with acute liver failure treated with the albumin dialysis molecular adsorbent recirculating system.采用白蛋白透析分子吸附再循环系统治疗的急性肝衰竭患者预后的预测标准
Ther Apher Dial. 2009 Oct;13(5):404-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-9987.2009.00759.x.
10
Predictors of death on the waiting list for liver transplantation characterized by a long waiting time.以等待时间长为特征的肝移植等待名单上的死亡预测因素。
Transpl Int. 2005 May;18(5):572-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00090.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Artificial liver support systems: what is new over the last decade?人工肝支持系统:过去十年有哪些新进展?
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 15;8(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0453-z.
2
Acute on Chronic Liver Failure-What is in a 'Definition'?慢性肝病急性肝衰竭——“定义”里包含了什么?
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2016 Sep;6(3):233-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.08.011. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
3
Early post-transplant survival: Interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status.移植后早期生存率:终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与住院状态的相互作用
J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
4
Prognostic performance of a series of model for end-stage liver disease and respective Δ scores in patients with hepatitis B acute-on-chronic liver failure.一系列终末期肝病模型的预后性能及乙型肝炎急性慢性肝衰竭患者的相应Δ评分
Mol Med Rep. 2014 May;9(5):1559-68. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.1983. Epub 2014 Feb 25.
5
Management of hepatorenal syndrome in patients with cirrhosis.肝硬化患者肝肾综合征的管理。
Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011 Aug 9;7(9):517-26. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2011.96.