• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植后早期生存率:终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与住院状态的相互作用

Early post-transplant survival: Interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status.

作者信息

Bittermann Therese, Makar George, Goldberg David S

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, United States; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, United States; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, United States.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.034
PMID:25858520
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4543524/
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Urgency-based allocation that relies on the MELD score prioritizes patients at the highest risk of waitlist mortality. However, identifying patients at greatest risk for short-term post-transplant mortality is needed in order to optimize the potential gains in overall survival obtained through improved long-term management of transplant recipients. There are limited data on the predictive ability of MELD score for early post-transplant mortality, and no data assessing the interaction between MELD score and hospitalization status.

METHODS

We analyzed UNOS data from 2002 to 2013 on 50,838 non-status 1 single-organ liver transplant recipients and fit multivariable logistic models to evaluate the association and interaction between MELD score and pre-transplant hospitalization status on short-term post-transplant mortality.

RESULTS

There was a significant interaction (p<0.01) between laboratory MELD score and hospitalization status on three-, six-, and 12-month post-transplant mortality in multivariable logistic models. This interaction was most pronounced in patients with a laboratory MELD score <25 transplanted from an ICU, whose adjusted predicted three-, six-, and 12-month post-transplant mortality approximated those of patients with a MELD score ⩾30. Compared to hospitalized patients with a MELD score of 30-34, those with a MELD score ⩾35 in an ICU had significantly increased risk of three-month (OR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.21-1.97), 6-month (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.09-1.67), and 12-month (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.52) post-transplant mortality.

DISCUSSION

Pre-transplant ICU status modifies the risk of early post-transplant mortality, independent of MELD score. This should be considered when determining candidacy for transplantation in order to optimize efficient use of a scarce resource.

摘要

背景与目的

基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的紧急分配方式会优先考虑等待名单上死亡风险最高的患者。然而,为了通过改善移植受者的长期管理来优化总体生存率的潜在收益,需要识别出移植后短期死亡风险最高的患者。关于MELD评分对移植后早期死亡率的预测能力的数据有限,且尚无评估MELD评分与住院状态之间相互作用的数据。

方法

我们分析了2002年至2013年器官共享联合网络(UNOS)关于50838例非1类单器官肝移植受者的数据,并拟合多变量逻辑模型,以评估MELD评分与移植前住院状态对移植后短期死亡率的关联及相互作用。

结果

在多变量逻辑模型中,实验室MELD评分与住院状态在移植后3个月、6个月和12个月死亡率方面存在显著的相互作用(p<0.01)。这种相互作用在实验室MELD评分<25且从重症监护病房(ICU)进行移植的患者中最为明显,其调整后的移植后3个月、6个月和12个月预测死亡率接近MELD评分≥30的患者。与MELD评分为30 - 34的住院患者相比,在ICU中MELD评分≥35的患者移植后3个月(比值比:1.54,95%置信区间:1.21 - 1.97)、6个月(比值比:1.35,95%置信区间:1.09 - 1.67)和12个月(比值比:1.25,95%置信区间:1.03 - 1.52)死亡风险显著增加。

讨论

移植前的ICU状态会改变移植后早期死亡风险,且独立于MELD评分。在确定移植候选资格时应考虑这一点,以便优化对稀缺资源的有效利用。

相似文献

1
Early post-transplant survival: Interaction of MELD score and hospitalization status.移植后早期生存率:终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与住院状态的相互作用
J Hepatol. 2015 Sep;63(3):601-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2015.03.034. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
2
Increased model for end-stage liver disease score at the time of liver transplant results in prolonged hospitalization and overall intensive care unit costs.肝移植时增加终末期肝病模型评分会导致住院时间延长和整体重症监护病房费用增加。
Liver Transpl. 2010 May;16(5):668-77. doi: 10.1002/lt.22027.
3
MELD score versus conventional UNOS status in predicting short-term mortality after liver transplantation.肝移植后预测短期死亡率的MELD评分与传统的器官共享联合网络(UNOS)状态对比
Transpl Int. 2005 Jan;18(1):65-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00024.x.
4
Longitudinal assessment of mortality risk among candidates for liver transplantation.肝移植候选者死亡风险的纵向评估。
Liver Transpl. 2003 Jan;9(1):12-8. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50009.
5
MELD may not be the better system for organ allocation in liver transplantation patients in Singapore.对于新加坡肝移植患者而言,终末期肝病模型(MELD)可能并非更好的器官分配系统。
Singapore Med J. 2006 Jul;47(7):592-4.
6
Risk factors for short- and long-term mortality in liver transplant recipients with MELD score ≥30.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分≥30的肝移植受者短期和长期死亡的危险因素。
Ann Transplant. 2015 Jan 29;20:59-69. doi: 10.12659/AOT.892322.
7
The combination of MELD score and ICG liver testing predicts length of stay in the ICU and hospital mortality in liver transplant recipients.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分与吲哚菁绿(ICG)肝脏检测相结合可预测肝移植受者在重症监护病房(ICU)的住院时间及医院死亡率。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Nov 15;14:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-103. eCollection 2014.
8
Potential predictive value of the MELD score for short-term mortality after liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对肝移植术后短期死亡率的潜在预测价值。
Transplant Proc. 2004 Apr;36(3):533-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.079.
9
Impact of the MELD allocation after its implementation in liver transplantation.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分系统在肝移植中应用后的影响。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jul;46(7-8):941-8. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.568521. Epub 2011 Mar 28.
10
Model for end-stage liver disease excluding international normalized ratio (MELD-XI) score predicts heart transplant outcomes: Evidence from the registry of the United Network for Organ Sharing.MELD-XI 评分排除国际标准化比值模型预测心脏移植结局:来自器官共享联合网络登记处的证据。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016 Feb;35(2):222-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Preoperative nutritional scores to predict mortality after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.预测肝移植术后死亡率的术前营养评分:一项回顾性队列研究。
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024 Oct;19(4):339-348. doi: 10.17085/apm.24045. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Con: Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Should Not Receive Priority on the Waiting List.反对观点:慢性肝衰竭急性发作患者不应在等候名单上享有优先权。
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2022 May 20;19(5):207-212. doi: 10.1002/cld.1193. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Textbook Outcome as a Quality Metric in Liver Transplantation.教科书式结局作为肝移植中的一项质量指标
Transplant Direct. 2022 Apr 15;8(5):e1322. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001322. eCollection 2022 May.
4
A decline in functional status while awaiting liver transplantation is predictive of increased post-transplantation mortality.在等待肝移植期间功能状态下降与移植后死亡率增加相关。
HPB (Oxford). 2022 Jun;24(6):825-832. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.10.008. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
5
Women who undergo liver transplant have longer length of stay post-transplant compared with men.接受肝移植的女性与男性相比,移植后住院时间更长。
Liver Int. 2020 Jul;40(7):1725-1735. doi: 10.1111/liv.14512. Epub 2020 May 25.
6
Approaches for patients with very high MELD scores.针对终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分极高的患者的治疗方法。
JHEP Rep. 2019 Feb 23;1(1):53-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2019.02.008. eCollection 2019 May.
7
Transplantation for Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure.急性慢性肝衰竭的肝移植治疗
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2019 Nov 6;14(4):152-155. doi: 10.1002/cld.852. eCollection 2019 Oct.
8
Pre-Operative Delta-MELD is an Independent Predictor of Higher Mortality following Liver Transplantation.术前 Delta-MELD 是肝移植术后更高死亡率的独立预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 5;9(1):8312. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44814-y.
9
Improving outcomes for transplantation of critically ill patients with cirrhosis?改善肝硬化重症患者的移植治疗效果?
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2017 Jul 28;10(1):25-28. doi: 10.1002/cld.646. eCollection 2017 Jul.
10
Liver transplantation for critically ill cirrhotic patients: Overview and pragmatic proposals.肝移植治疗危重症肝硬化患者:概述与实用建议。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec 14;24(46):5203-5214. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i46.5203.

本文引用的文献

1
The CLIF Consortium Acute Decompensation score (CLIF-C ADs) for prognosis of hospitalised cirrhotic patients without acute-on-chronic liver failure.CLIF 联盟急性失代偿评分(CLIF-C ADs)用于预测无慢加急性肝衰竭的住院肝硬化患者的预后。
J Hepatol. 2015 Apr;62(4):831-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
2
Frailty predicts waitlist mortality in liver transplant candidates.衰弱可预测肝移植候选者在等待名单上的死亡率。
Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1870-9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12762. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
3
Association of distance from a transplant center with access to waitlist placement, receipt of liver transplantation, and survival among US veterans.美国退伍军人中,与移植中心的距离与获得候补名单安置、接受肝移植和生存的关系。
JAMA. 2014 Mar 26;311(12):1234-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2520.
4
Muscle wasting: a nutritional criterion to prioritize patients for liver transplantation.肌肉消耗:一种用于确定肝移植患者优先顺序的营养标准。
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2014 May;17(3):219-25. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000046.
5
Prognostic value of muscle atrophy in cirrhosis using psoas muscle thickness on computed tomography.基于 CT 测量的竖脊肌厚度评估肝硬化患者肌肉萎缩的预后价值。
J Hepatol. 2014 Jun;60(6):1151-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.026. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
6
Predicting survival after liver transplantation based on pre-transplant MELD score: a systematic review of the literature.基于移植前 MELD 评分预测肝移植后的生存率:文献系统评价。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 12;8(12):e80661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080661. eCollection 2013.
7
Impact of the center on graft failure after liver transplantation.中心对肝移植后移植物失败的影响。
Liver Transpl. 2013 Sep;19(9):957-64. doi: 10.1002/lt.23685. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
8
Factors that predict short-term intensive care unit mortality in patients with cirrhosis.预测肝硬化患者短期重症监护病房死亡率的因素。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1194-1200.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.035. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
9
Acute-on-chronic liver failure is a distinct syndrome that develops in patients with acute decompensation of cirrhosis.急性慢性肝衰竭是一种独特的综合征,发生在肝硬化急性失代偿的患者中。
Gastroenterology. 2013 Jun;144(7):1426-37, 1437.e1-9. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.02.042. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
10
Simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation summit: current state and future directions.肝-肾联合移植峰会:现状与未来方向。
Am J Transplant. 2012 Nov;12(11):2901-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04190.x. Epub 2012 Jul 23.