Baxter David, Ghebrehewet Sam, Falconer Michelle
Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Unit, School of Translational Medicine, Manchester University Medical School, Manchester, UK.
Hum Vaccin. 2010 May;6(5):420-4. doi: 10.4161/hv.6.5.11234. Epub 2010 May 17.
Against a background of new developments and updated clinical guidelines, health care professionals (HCPs) administering childhood and adolescent immunizations require access to expert advice and support when appropriate. The clinical records of all pediatric referrals seen at a UK-based facility-the Stockport Specialist Immunization Clinic (SS IC)-between 01/10/2006 and 31/03/2007 were reviewed to determine the stated reason(s) for referral to a specialist immunization service and the outcome of that process. During the 6 month audit period, 430 case notes were identified and 410 (95%) were audited. Reasons for referral were primarily due to the medical condition of the child [118/410 (29%)], the child having experienced a previous vaccine adverse event [86/410 (21%)], or preterm birth of the child [86/410 (21%)]. The majority of referrals were from primary care [234/410 (57%)]. A total of 351 (85.6%) cases were categorized as appropriate referrals and 36 (11.6%) and 23 (5.6%) were categorized as inappropriate and equivocal, respectively. Four hundred and eight children completed a primary program; for two children the parents declined the advice offered. National data show that a small number of children remain susceptible to vaccine preventable diseases because they fail to access or complete immunization programs through their General Practitioner (GP) and this may be in part because the HCP is unsure about vaccine indications/contra-indications. Clearly a number of referring HCP s in this audit had some level of uncertainty when immunizing children with a pre-existing medical condition or a previous history of vaccine associated AEFI in the child/family, and this may be indicative of a more general problem among HCPs. A consistent approach to providing expert advice and support to primary care professionals in the UK would therefore be expected to make a significant impact on the immunization service by building confidence for parents/guardian, professionals and organizations involved in delivering it. The authors recommend a dedicated specialist immunization clinical service be considered as one approach to achieving this.
在新进展和更新的临床指南背景下,负责儿童和青少年免疫接种的医护人员(HCPs)在适当的时候需要获得专家建议和支持。对2006年10月1日至2007年3月31日期间在英国一家机构——斯托克波特专科免疫诊所(SS IC)就诊的所有儿科转诊病例的临床记录进行了审查,以确定转诊至专科免疫服务的所述原因以及该过程的结果。在6个月的审核期内,共识别出430份病例记录,其中410份(95%)接受了审核。转诊原因主要是儿童的健康状况[118/410(29%)]、儿童曾经历过疫苗不良事件[86/410(21%)]或儿童早产[86/410(21%)]。大多数转诊来自初级保健机构[234/410(57%)]。共有351例(85.6%)被归类为适当转诊,36例(11.6%)和23例(5.6%)分别被归类为不适当转诊和模棱两可的转诊。408名儿童完成了主要免疫程序;有两名儿童的家长拒绝了所提供的建议。国家数据显示,少数儿童仍然易患疫苗可预防疾病,因为他们未能通过全科医生(GP)接种或完成免疫程序,这可能部分是因为医护人员对疫苗适应证/禁忌证不确定。显然,在此次审核中,一些转诊的医护人员在为有既往病史或儿童/家庭有疫苗相关AEFI既往史的儿童接种疫苗时存在一定程度的不确定性,这可能表明医护人员中存在更普遍的问题。因此,预计在英国为初级保健专业人员提供专家建议和支持的一致方法将通过增强参与提供免疫服务的家长/监护人、专业人员和组织的信心,对免疫服务产生重大影响。作者建议考虑设立专门的专科免疫临床服务作为实现这一目标的一种方法。